How an emergency department is organized to provide opioid-specific harm reduction and facilitators and barriers to harm reduction implementation: a systems perspective

Harm Reduction Journal

Research

Vicky Bungay¹  Sunny Jiao¹  Emily Jenkins¹  Marilou Gagnon² 

[1] School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, V6T 2B5, Vancouver, BC, Canada;School of Nursing, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, HSD Building A402a, V8P 5C2, Victoria, BC, Canada;

关键词: Harm reduction;    Emergency department;    Acute care;    Unregulated substance use;    Complex adaptive systems;    Opioid agonist treatment;    Supervised consumption;    Withdrawal management;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12954-023-00871-1

 received in 2023-06-01, accepted in 2023-09-13,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe intersection of dual public health emergencies—the COVID-19 pandemic and the drug toxicity crisis—has led to an urgent need for acute care based harm reduction for unregulated opioid use. Emergency Departments (EDs) as Complex Adaptive Systems (CASs) with multiple, interdependent, and interacting elements are suited to deliver such interventions. This paper examines how the ED is organized to provide harm reduction and identifies facilitators and barriers to implementation in light of interactions between system elements.MethodsUsing a case study design, we conducted interviews with Emergency Physicians (n = 5), Emergency Nurses (n = 10), and clinical leaders (n = 5). Nine organizational policy documents were also collected. Interview data were analysed using a Reflexive Thematic Analysis approach. Policy documents were analysed using a predetermined coding structure pertaining to staffing roles and responsibilities and the interrelationships therein for the delivery of opioid-specific harm reduction in the ED. The theory of CAS informed data analysis.ResultsAn array of system agents, including substance use specialist providers and non-specialist providers, interacted in ways that enable the provision of harm reduction interventions in the ED, including opioid agonist treatment, supervised consumption, and withdrawal management. However, limited access to specialist providers, when coupled with specialist control, non-specialist reliance, and concerns related to safety, created tensions in the system that hinder harm reduction provision with resulting implications for the delivery of care.ConclusionsTo advance harm reduction implementation, there is a need for substance use specialist services that are congruent with the 24 h a day service delivery model of the ED, and for organizational policies that are attentive to discourses of specialized practice, hierarchical relations of power, and the dynamic regulatory landscape. Implementation efforts that take into consideration these perspectives have the potential to reduce harms experienced by people who use unregulated opioids, not only through overdose prevention and improving access to safer opioid alternatives, but also through supporting people to complete their unique care journeys.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 图 表 】

42004_2023_995_Article_IEq34.gif