Development of a rare disease algorithm to identify persons at risk of Gaucher disease using electronic health records in the United States

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

Research

Cliona Molony¹  Alexandra Dumitriu²  Mario Aguiar³  Davorka Sekulic³  Amanda Wilson⁴  Neha Shah⁵  Marie Génin⁶  Martin Montmerle⁶  Simon Gosset⁶  Mélissa Rollot⁶  Alexandra Chiorean⁶  Margot Blanchon⁶  Lisa Sniderman King⁷  Patrick Pavlick⁷ 

[1] Digital Data Science, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA;Global Medical Affairs, Medical Evidence Generation, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA;Global Medical Affairs, RD Hematology, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA;Health Economics and Value Assessment, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA;Medical Diagnostics, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA;Quinten Health, Paris, France;US Rare Medical, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA;

关键词: Electronic health records;    Gaucher disease;    Machine learning;    Patient identification;    Real-world evidence;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13023-023-02868-2

 received in 2022-12-14, accepted in 2023-08-23,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundEarly diagnosis of Gaucher disease (GD) allows for disease-specific treatment before significant symptoms arise, preventing/delaying onset of complications. Yet, many endure years-long diagnostic odysseys. We report the development of a machine learning algorithm to identify patients with GD from electronic health records.MethodsWe utilized Optum’s de-identified Integrated Claims-Clinical dataset (2007–2019) for feature engineering and algorithm training/testing, based on clinical characteristics of GD. Two algorithms were selected: one based on age of feature occurrence (age-based), and one based on occurrence of features (prevalence-based). Performance was compared with an adaptation of the available clinical diagnostic algorithm for identifying patients with diagnosed GD. Undiagnosed patients highly-ranked by the algorithms were compared with diagnosed GD patients.ResultsSplenomegaly was the most important predictor for diagnosed GD with both algorithms, followed by geographical location (northeast USA), thrombocytopenia, osteonecrosis, bone density disorders, and bone pain. Overall, 1204 and 2862 patients, respectively, would need to be assessed with the age- and prevalence-based algorithms, compared with 20,743 with the clinical diagnostic algorithm, to identify 28 patients with diagnosed GD in the integrated dataset. Undiagnosed patients highly-ranked by the algorithms had similar clinical manifestations as diagnosed GD patients.ConclusionsThe age-based algorithm identified younger patients, while the prevalence-based identified patients with advanced clinical manifestations. Their combined use better captures GD heterogeneity. The two algorithms were about 10–20-fold more efficient at identifying GD patients than the clinical diagnostic algorithm. Application of these algorithms could shorten diagnostic delay by identifying undiagnosed GD patients.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 4