期刊论文详细信息
BMC Nephrology
Patient participation in end-stage kidney disease care: variation over time and effects of staff-directed interventions - a quasi-experimental study
Research
Liselott Årestedt1  Marcus Bendtsen2  Caroline Hurtig2  Fredrik Uhlin3  Ann Catrine Eldh4 
[1] Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden;Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden;Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden;Department of Nephrology, Region Östergötland, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden;Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech), 19086, Tallinn, Estonia;Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden;Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden;
关键词: Chronic kidney failure;    End-stage kidney disease;    Patient participation;    Patient-centred care;    Patient preference;    Person-centred care;    Quality of health care;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12882-023-03313-z
 received in 2023-04-11, accepted in 2023-08-29,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAmong those elements establishing decent quality of care from a patient perspective, opportunities to participate in accord with one’s individual needs and preferences are central. To date, little is known the extent of preference-based patient participation in kidney care, and what facilitates optimal conditions. This study investigated i) preference-based patient participation in kidney care over time, and ii) the effects of interventions designed to enhance person-centred patient participation.MethodsA quasi-experimental study was conducted across nine kidney care sites in southeast Sweden. A cohort of 358 patients with stage IV chronic kidney disease (eGRF 15–19 ml/min) or V (eGRF < 15 mL/min) entered the study. Of these, 245 patients (with kidney replacement therapy or intermittent outpatient visits only) completed a survey on patient participation at four time points: every six months from August 2019 to May 2021, patients reported their preferences for and experiences of participation using the validated Patient Preferences for Patient Participation tool, the 4Ps. Between the first and second data collection points, interventions were provided for designated staff to facilitate person-centred participation, using two strategies for two subgroups at three sites each: the managers receiving a bundle of information via e-mail on patient participation in a standard dissemination procedure (three sites), or an additional half-year support program for implementation offered to 1–2 staff per site (three sites), with no intervention for a control group (three sites). The differences in 4Ps data between groups were analysed using multilevel ordinal regression.ResultsOver time and across all sites, most patients’ experiences of participation fully or almost fully matched their engagement preferences (57%–90%). Still, up to 12% of patient reports indicated that their preferences and experiences were insufficiently matched: in these cases, the patients had preferred to be more involved than they had experienced, for example, in making healthcare plans and setting health-related goals. The interventions did not affect the levels of preference-based participation, but patients in the control group sites had slightly more consistent matches.ConclusionsLiving with kidney failure necessitates patient engagement, but opportunities to participate in accordance with one’s preferences are not fully provided for all patients. Additional efforts to support a common understanding and to ensure person-centred patient participation is still needed.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202310112215108ZK.pdf 1481KB PDF download
Fig. 5 299KB Image download
Fig. 1 49KB Image download
Fig. 4 137KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:1次