Frontiers in Education | |
The construct validity of the main student selection tests for medical studies in Germany | |
Education | |
Johanna Hissbach1  Nicolas Becker2  Frank M. Spinath3  Julie Levacher3  Marco Koch3  Malvin Escher4  Stephan J. Stegt5  | |
[1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany;Department of Individual Differences and Psychodiagnostics, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany;Department of Individual Differences and Psychodiagnostics, Saarland University, Saarbrucken, Germany;Faculty of Medicine, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;ITB Consulting GmbH, Bonn, Germany; | |
关键词: student selection; cognitive ability; construct validity; psychometrics; g-factor; | |
DOI : 10.3389/feduc.2023.1120129 | |
received in 2022-12-09, accepted in 2023-02-08, 发布年份 2023 | |
来源: Frontiers | |
【 摘 要 】
Standardized ability tests that are associated with intelligence are often used for student selection. In Germany two different admission procedures to select students for medical studies are used simultaneously; the TMS and the HAM-Nat. Due to this simultaneous use of both a detailed analysis of the construct validity is mandatory. Therefore, the aim of the study is the construct validation of both selection procedures by using data of 4,528 participants (Mage = 20.42, SD = 2.74) who took part in a preparation study under low stakes conditions. This study compares different model specifications within the correlational structure of intelligence factors as well as analysis the g-factor consistency of the admission tests. Results reveal that all subtests are correlated substantially. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analyses demonstrate that both admission tests (and their subtests) are related to g as well as to a further test-specific-factor. Therefore, from a psychometric point of view, the simultaneous use of both student selection procedures appears to be legitimate.
【 授权许可】
Unknown
Copyright © 2023 Levacher, Koch, Stegt, Hissbach, Spinath, Escher and Becker.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202310108877316ZK.pdf | 799KB | download |