期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Education
The construct validity of the main student selection tests for medical studies in Germany
Education
Johanna Hissbach1  Nicolas Becker2  Frank M. Spinath3  Julie Levacher3  Marco Koch3  Malvin Escher4  Stephan J. Stegt5 
[1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany;Department of Individual Differences and Psychodiagnostics, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany;Department of Individual Differences and Psychodiagnostics, Saarland University, Saarbrucken, Germany;Faculty of Medicine, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;ITB Consulting GmbH, Bonn, Germany;
关键词: student selection;    cognitive ability;    construct validity;    psychometrics;    g-factor;   
DOI  :  10.3389/feduc.2023.1120129
 received in 2022-12-09, accepted in 2023-02-08,  发布年份 2023
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Standardized ability tests that are associated with intelligence are often used for student selection. In Germany two different admission procedures to select students for medical studies are used simultaneously; the TMS and the HAM-Nat. Due to this simultaneous use of both a detailed analysis of the construct validity is mandatory. Therefore, the aim of the study is the construct validation of both selection procedures by using data of 4,528 participants (Mage = 20.42, SD = 2.74) who took part in a preparation study under low stakes conditions. This study compares different model specifications within the correlational structure of intelligence factors as well as analysis the g-factor consistency of the admission tests. Results reveal that all subtests are correlated substantially. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analyses demonstrate that both admission tests (and their subtests) are related to g as well as to a further test-specific-factor. Therefore, from a psychometric point of view, the simultaneous use of both student selection procedures appears to be legitimate.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Levacher, Koch, Stegt, Hissbach, Spinath, Escher and Becker.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202310108877316ZK.pdf 799KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:5次