期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Animal Science
Review of the influence of farrowing and lactation housing and positive human contact on sow and piglet welfare
Animal Science
Alan J. Tilbrook1  Kirsty L. Chidgey2  Paul H. Hemsworth3  Rutu Y. Galea3  Lauren M. Hemsworth3  Megan E. Lucas3 
[1] Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation and the School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia;School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand;The Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia;
关键词: housing system;    human contact;    farrowing;    lactation;    sows;    piglets;    welfare;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fanim.2023.1230830
 received in 2023-05-29, accepted in 2023-07-31,  发布年份 2023
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Farrowing crates continue to be the most common system of housing farrowing and lactating sows, however continuous confinement is one of the most contentious welfare issues in livestock production. This review aims to critically evaluate the scientific literature on the implications of two important determinants of sow and piglet welfare: housing and human contact. While the evidence in sows is contradictory, there is consistent evidence of a greater short-term cortisol response in gilts introduced to farrowing crates than pens and there is limited evidence of changes in the HPA axis consistent with sustained stress in gilts during the fourth week of lactation. Confinement of sows during lactation increases stereotypic behaviour, reduces sow-piglet interactions, nursing duration and lying behaviour, and may contribute to leg and shoulder injuries in sows. Piglets reared by sows in pens display more play and less oral manipulative behaviours and generally have better growth rates than those reared in farrowing crates. However, there is increasing interest in developing alternate housing systems with minimal sow confinement and reduced piglet mortality risk. Recent research on temporary crating of sows suggests that confinement briefly around farrowing may be the best compromise between continuous housing in farrowing crates and pens, as it may reduce live-born piglet mortality, while providing the opportunity for the sow to move more freely prior to parturition. Together with housing, the behaviour of stockpeople is a key determinant of pig welfare. Recent evidence shows that positive handling of piglets during lactation reduces fear behaviour and physiological stress responses of pigs to humans, novelty and routine husbandry practices, and thus may be enriching for piglets. As a source of enrichment, positive human interactions provide several advantages: close interactions with piglets usually occur several times daily, positive interactions can be combined with routine checks, human interactions invariably provide variability in their predictability which will minimise habituation, and positive interactions may not require additional physical resources. There is a clear need for comprehensive research examining both the short- and long-term welfare implications and the practicality of less confinement of the sow, and positive handling of both sows and piglets during lactation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Hemsworth, Tilbrook, Galea, Lucas, Chidgey and Hemsworth

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202310107496575ZK.pdf 784KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:1次