A novel classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and associated surgical management

Frontiers in Surgery

Surgery

Zhengbo Tao¹  Tao Lin¹  Ce Wang¹  Xin Zhou¹  Xuhui Zhou¹  Heng Jiang¹  Jinhui Wu¹  Miao Hu¹  Rui Gao¹  Jun Ma² 

[1] Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China;Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China;

关键词: cervical deformity;    hemivertebra;    surgical method;    classification;    reliability study;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123397

 received in 2022-12-14, accepted in 2023-02-27,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveTo propose and validate a new classification of surgical methods for patients with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae.MethodThis article reviewed cases diagnosed with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2019. The results of preoperative (initial visit), postoperative and/or final follow-up were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, spinal balance parameters, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire (SRS-22). We also performed a reliability study to assess this classification.ResultThe classification includes three types. Each type can be divided into two subtypes, and a preliminary algorithm is proposed. Type I: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and only a single hemivertebra of the subaxial cervical hemivertebra needs to be resected. Type II: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and multiple subaxial cervical hemivertebrae need to be removed. Type III: No apparent deformity in the neck, at least one subaxial cervical hemivertebra existed or Klipper-Feil syndrome. Each type is divided into two subtypes, A and B, according to whether the upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies of the rescected hemivertebra(e) are fused. We propose corresponding treatment methods for different types. We included a total of 121 patients and reviewed the prognosis for each type of patient. All patients achieved satisfactory results. The reliability study showed that the mean interobserver agreement was 91.8% (89.3%–93.4%), and the κ value was 0.845 (0.800–0.875). The intraobserver agreement ranged from 93.4% to 97.5%, with a mean κ value of 0.929 (0.881 to 0.954).ConclusionIn our study, we proposed and validated a new classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and proposed corresponding treatment plans for different classifications.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© 2023 Wu, Hu, Tao, Zhou, Jiang, Lin, Ma, Gao, Wang and Zhou.