Prediction accuracy of regulatory elements from sequence varies by functional sequencing technique

Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Kimani Njoya¹  Michelle M. Riehle¹  Ronald J. Nowling²  John G. Peters² 

[1] Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States;Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Milwaukee School of Engineering, Milwaukee, WI, United States;

关键词: enhancers;    functional sequencing;    machine learning;    sequence models;    DNase-seq;    STARR-seq;    ChIP-seq;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fcimb.2023.1182567

 received in 2023-03-08, accepted in 2023-07-10,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

IntroductionVarious sequencing based approaches are used to identify and characterize the activities of cis-regulatory elements in a genome-wide fashion. Some of these techniques rely on indirect markers such as histone modifications (ChIP-seq with histone antibodies) or chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq, DNase-seq, FAIRE-seq), while other techniques use direct measures such as episomal assays measuring the enhancer properties of DNA sequences (STARR-seq) and direct measurement of the binding of transcription factors (ChIP-seq with transcription factor-specific antibodies). The activities of cis-regulatory elements such as enhancers, promoters, and repressors are determined by their sequence and secondary processes such as chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, and bound histone markers.MethodsHere, machine learning models are employed to evaluate the accuracy with which cis-regulatory elements identified by various commonly used sequencing techniques can be predicted by their underlying sequence alone to distinguish between cis-regulatory activity that is reflective of sequence content versus secondary processes.Results and discussionModels trained and evaluated on D. melanogaster sequences identified through DNase-seq and STARR-seq are significantly more accurate than models trained on sequences identified by H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac ChIP-seq, FAIRE-seq, and ATAC-seq. These results suggest that the activity detected by DNase-seq and STARR-seq can be largely explained by underlying DNA sequence, independent of secondary processes. Experimentally, a subset of DNase-seq and H3K4me1 ChIP-seq sequences were tested for enhancer activity using luciferase assays and compared with previous tests performed on STARR-seq sequences. The experimental data indicated that STARR-seq sequences are substantially enriched for enhancer-specific activity, while the DNase-seq and H3K4me1 ChIP-seq sequences are not. Taken together, these results indicate that the DNase-seq approach identifies a broad class of regulatory elements of which enhancers are a subset and the associated data are appropriate for training models for detecting regulatory activity from sequence alone, STARR-seq data are best for training enhancer-specific sequence models, and H3K4me1 ChIP-seq data are not well suited for training and evaluating sequence-based models for cis-regulatory element prediction.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Nowling, Njoya, Peters and Riehle