期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Oncology
Development and validation of nomogram models to predict radiotherapy or chemotherapy benefit in stage III/IV gastric adenocarcinoma with surgery
Oncology
Zenan Hu1  Yuping Wang1  Yongning Zhou1  Qian Ma2  Xiaolong Tang3  Xiangqing Ren4  Tian Huang4  Ya Zheng4 
[1] Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China;Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China;Geriatrics Department, Xianyang First People’s Hospital, Xianyang, China;The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China;The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China;Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China;Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China;
关键词: gastric cancer;    chemotherapy;    radiotherapy;    SEER;    prognostic model;    nomogram;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fonc.2023.1223857
 received in 2023-05-16, accepted in 2023-07-25,  发布年份 2023
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

ObjectivesThe advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients (stage III/IV) with surgery may have inconsistent prognoses due to different demographic and clinicopathological factors. In this retrospective study, we developed clinical prediction models for estimating the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in advanced GAC patients with surgeryMethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The total population from 2004 to 2015 was divided into four levels according to age, of which 179 were younger than 45 years old, 695 were 45-59 years old, 1064 were 60-74 years old, and 708 were older than 75 years old. There were 1,712 men and 934 women. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for OS and CSS. Nomograms were constructed to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS. The models’ calibration and discrimination efficiency were validated. Discrimination and accuracy were evaluated using the consistency index, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration plots; and clinical usefulness was assessed using decision curve analysis. Cross-validation was also conducted to evaluate the accuracy and stability of the models. Prognostic factors identified by Cox regression were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.ResultsA total of 2,646 patients were included in our OS study. Age, primary site, differentiation grade, AJCC 6th_TNM stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and number of regional nodes examined were identified as prognostic factors for OS in advanced GAC patients with surgery (P < 0.05). A total of 2,369 patients were included in our CSS study. Age, primary site, differentiation grade, AJCC 6th_TNM stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and number of regional nodes examined were identified as risk factors for CSS in these patients (P < 0.05). These factors were used to construct the nomogram to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS of advanced GAC patients with surgery. The consistency index and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the models effectively differentiated between events and nonevents. The calibration plots for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS probability showed good consistence between the predicted and the actual events. The decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram had higher clinical predictive value and more significant net gain than AJCC 6th_TNM stage in predicting OS and CSS of advanced GAC patients with surgery. Cross-validation also revealed good accuracy and stability of the models.ConclusionThe developed predictive models provided available prognostic estimates for advanced GAC patients with surgery. Our findings suggested that both OS and CSS can benefit from chemotherapy or radiotherapy in these patients.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Ren, Huang, Tang, Ma, Zheng, Hu, Wang and Zhou

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202310103630798ZK.pdf 3235KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次