期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Immunology
Fecal microbiota transplantation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Immunology
Songbo Zhao1  Mancai Wang1  Zheyuan Wang1  Youcheng Zhang1  Xiaofeng Xie2  Xiaojuan Ma2 
[1] Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China;Department of Histology and Embryology, Medical College of Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, China;
关键词: fecal microbiota transplantation;    irritable bowel syndrome;    systematic review;    meta-analysis;    gut microbiome;    influence factor;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fimmu.2023.1136343
 received in 2023-01-02, accepted in 2023-04-27,  发布年份 2023
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveWhether fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is effective in improving outcomes remains controversial. We assessed the safety and efficacy of FMT for patients with IBS.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the clinicaltrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) up to February 25, 2022, updated to March 28, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the stool and capsule FMT with placebo in patients with IBS were included. Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed risk of bias. We did meta-analysis with RevMan, and the Stata software was used for sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of evidences. Mean difference (MD) or standardized Mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI for continuous data, and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data were used with random-effects models. The primary outcomes included the clinical response rate and IBS-SSS score. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42022328377.ResultsNineteen reports from nine RCTs were included finally. Compared with the placebo, a single stool FMT could significantly decrease the IBS-SSS score at 1 month (MD=-65.75, 95%CI [-129.37, -2.13]), 3 months (MD=-102.11, 95% CI [-141.98, -62.24]), 6 months (MD=-84.38, 95%CI [-158.79, -9.97]), 24 months (MD=-110.41, 95%CI [-145.37, -75.46]), and 36 months (MD=-104.71, 95%CI [-137.78, -71.64]). It also could improve the clinical response rate at 3 months (RR=1.91, 95% [1.12, 3.25]), 24 months (RR=2.97, 95% [1.94, 4.54]), and 36 months (RR=2.48, 95% [1.65, 3.72]), and increase the IBS-QoL score at 3 months, 24 months, and 36 months. FMT did not increase the serious adverse event. The risk of bias was low, and the quality of evidence based on GRADE system was moderate in the stool FMT group. However, we did not find positive effect of capsule FMT on patients with IBS based on the current available data.ConclusionA single stool FMT is effective and safe for patients with IBS. However, some factors may affect the effectiveness of FMT, and the relationship between the gut microbiome and the effect of FMT for IBS is still unclear.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022328377.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Wang, Xie, Zhao, Ma, Wang and Zhang

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202310102819713ZK.pdf 3338KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:0次