Psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media: A scoping review

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Psychiatry

Rafal Rygula¹  Michal Piksa¹  Karolina Noworyta¹  Jan Piasecki²  Paweł Gwiaździński³  Aleksander B. Gundersen⁴  Jonas R. Kunst⁴  Agata Olejniuk⁵  Izabela Krysińska⁵  Mikołaj Morzy⁵  Tomi Wójtowicz⁵ 

[1] Affective Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland;Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland;Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland;Consciousness Lab, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland;Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Poznań University of Technology, Poznań, Poland;

关键词: misinformation;    social media;    scoping review;    systematic review;    psychological interventions;    Facebook;    Twitter;    Reddit;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974782

 received in 2022-06-21, accepted in 2022-11-30,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

IntroductionThe rise of social media users and the explosive growth in misinformation shared across social media platforms have become a serious threat to democratic discourse and public health. The mentioned implications have increased the demand for misinformation detection and intervention. To contribute to this challenge, we are presenting a systematic scoping review of psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media. The review was conducted to (i) identify and map evidence on psychological interventions countering misinformation, (ii) compare the viability of the interventions on social media, and (iii) provide guidelines for the development of effective interventions.MethodsA systematic search in three bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) and additional searches in Google Scholar and reference lists were conducted.Results3,561 records were identified, 75 of which met the eligibility criteria for the inclusion in the final review. The psychological interventions identified during the review can be classified into three categories distinguished by Kozyreva et al.: Boosting, Technocognition, and Nudging, and then into 15 types within these. Most of the studied interventions were not implemented and tested in a real social media environment but under strictly controlled settings or online crowdsourcing platforms. The presented feasibility assessment of implementation insights expressed qualitatively and with numerical scoring could guide the development of future interventions that can be successfully implemented on social media platforms.DiscussionThe review provides the basis for further research on psychological interventions counteracting misinformation. Future research on interventions should aim to combine effective Technocognition and Nudging in the user experience of online services.Systematic review registration[https://figshare.com/], identifier [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14649432.v2].

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Gwiaździński, Gundersen, Piksa, Krysińska, Kunst, Noworyta, Olejniuk, Morzy, Rygula, Wójtowicz and Piasecki.