Association between handgrip strength asymmetry and cognitive function across ethnicity in rural China: a cross-sectional study

Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Neuroscience

Ruixue Li¹  Cuiying Gu¹  Hui Guo¹  Wei Yuan¹  Mingfeng Ma²  Zhaoqing Sun³  Yao Zhang⁴  Liqiang Zheng⁵  Wenjing Feng⁶  Hanshu Gao⁶ 

[1] Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China;Department of Cardiology, Fenyang Hospital of Shanxi Province, Fenyang, Shanxi, China;Department of Cardiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China;Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China;Ministry of Education-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China;Ministry of Education-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China;Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China;

关键词: handgrip strength asymmetry;    handgrip strength;    cognitive function;    cross-sectional study;    ethnicity;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fnagi.2023.1191197

 received in 2023-03-21, accepted in 2023-05-05,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundRecently, the association between handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry and cognition has been revealed, but evidences are still scarce. Particularly, the association between asymmetric HGS and cognitive performance in various cognitive domains is unclear and whether this association is stable across ethnic groups is unknown.MethodThe population was from a longitudinal study in rural areas of Fuxin, Liaoning, China. The Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MOCA-BC) was used to evaluate the cognitive function. The HGS ratio was calculated as maximal non-dominant HGS divided by maximal dominant HGS. HGS ratio <0.9 or >1.1 was classified as asymmetric dominant/non-dominant HGS, respectively. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the relationship between asymmetric HGS and cognitive function adjusted for HGS, handedness, wave, age, sex, education, ethnicity, smoking, drinking, physical labor level, BMI, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia.ResultA total of 2,969 participants ≥50 years were included in this study. Adjusted for HGS and other confunding variables, there was an inverted U-shaped association between HGS ratio and MoCA-BC scores (P non–linear = 0.004). The association between HGS ratio and MoCA-BC scores was inconsistent among ethnic groups (P interaction = 0.048). In Han, only asymmetric non-dominant HGS was associated with lower cognitive scores [β = −0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.26 ∼−0.08, P = 0.027]; in Mongolians, asymmetric dominant HGS(β = −0.60, 95% CI: −1.35 ∼ 0.15, P = 0.115) and asymmetric non-dominant HGS (β = −0.56, 95% CI: −1.42 ∼ 0.31, P = 0.206) were all associated with lower cognitive scores, although no statistical significance was found. Asymmetric non-dominant HGS and lower HGS, but not asymmetric dominant HGS were all independently associated with impairment of Delayed Recall (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05 ∼ 1.74; OR per 5 kg decrease = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 ∼ 1.21) and Fluency (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15 ∼ 1.78; OR per 5 kg decrease = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02 ∼ 1.19). Both asymmetric dominant HGS (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07 ∼ 1.67) and lower HGS (OR per 5 kg decrease = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10 ∼ 1.32) were associated with impairment of visuoperception.ConclusionHGS and HGS asymmetry were all independently related to lower global cognitive performance. The association between HGS asymmetry and cognitive function varies among ethnic groups.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Feng, Ma, Gao, Yuan, Li, Guo, Gu, Sun, Zhang and Zheng.