What are the effects of flow-regime changes on fish productivity in temperate regions? A systematic map

Environmental Evidence

Systematic Map

Joseph R. Bennett¹  Lisa A. Donaldson²  Jessica J. Taylor²  Meagan Harper³  Trina Rytwinski³  Steven J. Cooke³  Daniel Boisclair⁴  Haitham Ghamry⁵  Karen E. Smokorowski⁶  Keith Clarke⁷  Julian D. Olden⁸  Michael J. Bradford⁹ 

[1] Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Départment de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada;Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 501 University Cres, Winnipeg, MB, Canada;Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada;Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John’s, NF, Canada;School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;West Vancouver Laboratory, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, West Vancouver, BC, Canada;

关键词: Dam;    Evidence-based policy;    Fish biomass;    Fish abundance;    Fish density;    Flow modification;    Hydroelectric;    Reservoirs;    River regulation;    Stream;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13750-020-00190-z

 received in 2019-11-01, accepted in 2020-04-07,  发布年份 2020

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThere is growing evidence of the potential negative consequences of altered flow regimes, in terms of magnitude, frequency, timing, duration or season pattern, on fluvial ecosystems and the fisheries they support. The scientific and policy communities have acknowledged the need for a better understanding of the effects of flow alteration on fish productivity. We conducted a systematic map to provide an overview of the existing literature base on the effects of flow-regime changes on direct outcomes of freshwater or estuarine fish productivity in temperate regions to inform stakeholders and policy makers.MethodsTo identify relevant articles for inclusion in this systematic map, we searched six bibliographic databases, 29 organizational websites, one search engine, and 297 reviews, and solicited grey literature through relevant sources. We screened articles at title and abstract, then by full-text using predefined inclusion criteria. Included studies were coded for key variables of interest, along with a very basic critical appraisal for internal validity (i.e., susceptibility to bias). The quantity and characteristics of the available evidence, knowledge gaps and subtopics with sufficient coverage for full systematic reviewing are reported in a narrative synthesis. The distribution and frequency of examined effects of flow-regime changes on fish productivity outcomes are presented in visual heatmaps.Review findingsA total of 1368 studies from 1199 articles were included in the systematic map database and used to identify a number of interesting themes in the evidence base: (1) large evidence bases were found in temperate regions of United States of America (USA), Canada, and Australia; (2) most studies either used a temporal or spatial trend design i.e., lacking a ‘true’ before intervention time period, or no intervention control sites; (3) the most studied causes of altered flow regime were natural (e.g., floods, droughts, climate change), hydroelectric facilities (hydro), and dams with no hydro; and (4) there were clear clusters of studies evaluating effects of changes in magnitude and surrogate measures (e.g., velocity, water depth) on fish productivity outcomes, in particular abundance and diversity metrics. A number of potential knowledge gaps were identified: including geographic (Northern Africa, and possibly parts of Asia), causes of altered flow regime (restoration, land-use change, and water abstraction/extraction/diversion), interventions (flow duration, frequency, rate of change, or timing), outcomes (population viability) and specific intervention/cause/outcome groups (e.g., changes in flow magnitude due to hydro or natural causes and fish survival, performance, and reproduction). A few aspects in methodology were also identified across studies, primarily a lack of true comparators (e.g., temporal or spatial trend designs).ConclusionsThis map suggests subtopics warranting future evidence synthesis include, examinations into how changes in flow magnitude affects: (1) fish abundance for dams with no hydro causes; (2) fish abundance, diversity/richness, migration, and growth for hydro causes; and (3) fish abundance, diversity/richness, growth, community structure, recruitment, and migrating fish abundance for natural causes. More comprehensive evidence is needed to understand how: (1) fish productivity metrics are affected by changes in flow regime due to restoration, land-use change, and water withdrawal/diversion activities; (2) how fish productivity is affected by changes to components of flow regime other than magnitude (e.g., flow duration, frequency); and (3) changes in flow magnitude due to hydro or natural causes affect fish survival, performance, and reproduction; and (4) changes in flow regime (all causes, all interventions) affect population viability.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2020

【 图 表 】

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

13690_2023_1147_Article_IEq19.gif

13690_2023_1147_Article_IEq14.gif

Fig. 1

13690_2023_1147_Article_IEq11.gif

13690_2023_1147_Article_IEq9.gif

13690_2023_1147_Article_IEq7.gif

13690_2023_1147_Article_IEq3.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 3