期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Diversified caregiver input to upgrade the Young Children’s Participation and Environment Measure for equitable pediatric re/habilitation practice
Research
Rachel Teplicky1  Michelle Phoenix1  Zurisadai Salgado2  Vivian C. Villegas2  Dianna L. Bosak2  Mary A. Khetani3  Natalie Parde4 
[1]CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, USA
[2]Children’s Participation in Environment Research Lab, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
[3]Children’s Participation in Environment Research Lab, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
[4]Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois Chicago, 1919 West Taylor Street, Room 316A, 60612-7250, Chicago, IL, USA
[5]Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
关键词: User-centered design;    Caregivers;    Environment;    Diversity, equity, inclusion;    Participation;    Early childhood;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s41687-023-00627-2
 received in 2023-04-13, accepted in 2023-08-10,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundPractitioner and family experiences of pediatric re/habilitation can be inequitable. The Young Children’s Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM) is an evidence-based and promising electronic patient-reported outcome measure that was designed with and for caregivers for research and practice. This study examined historically minoritized caregivers’ responses to revised YC-PEM content modifications and their perspectives on core intelligent virtual agent functionality needed to improve its reach for equitable service design.MethodsCaregivers were recruited during a routine early intervention (EI) service visit and met five inclusion criteria: (1) were 18 + years old; (2) identified as the parent or legal guardian of a child 0–3 years old enrolled in EI services for 3 + months; (3) read, wrote, and spoke English; (4) had Internet and telephone access; and (5) identified as a parent or legal guardian of a Black, non-Hispanic child or as publicly insured. Three rounds of semi-structured cognitive interviews (55–90 min each) used videoconferencing to gather caregiver feedback on their responses to select content modifications while completing YC-PEM, and their ideas for core intelligent virtual agent functionality. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, cross-checked for accuracy, and deductively and inductively content analyzed by multiple staff in three rounds.ResultsEight Black, non-Hispanic caregivers from a single urban EI catchment and with diverse income levels (Mdn = $15,001–20,000) were enrolled, with children (M = 21.2 months, SD = 7.73) enrolled in EI. Caregivers proposed three ways to improve comprehension (clarify item wording, remove or simplify terms, add item examples). Environmental item edits prompted caregivers to share how they relate and respond to experiences with interpersonal and institutional discrimination impacting participation. Caregivers characterized three core functions of a virtual agent to strengthen YC-PEM navigation (read question aloud, visual and verbal prompts, more examples and/or definitions).ConclusionsResults indicate four ways that YC-PEM content will be modified to strengthen how providers screen for unmet participation needs and determinants to design pediatric re/habilitation services that are responsive to family priorities. Results also motivate the need for user-centered design of an intelligent virtual agent to strengthen user navigation, prior to undertaking a community-based pragmatic trial of its implementation for equitable practice.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309153267928ZK.pdf 1085KB PDF download
MediaObjects/12947_2023_312_MOESM3_ESM.zip 1541KB Package download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_5066_MOESM1_ESM.docx 434KB Other download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次