期刊论文详细信息
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Quality of life of COVID-19 recovered patients: a 1-year follow-up study from Bangladesh
Research Article
Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader1  Irin Chowdhury1  Mohammad Hayatun Nabi1  Mosharop Hossian1  Samanta Sabed1  Habiba Babul1  Tajrin Rahman1  Sabrina Afroz Borsha1  Sree Shib Shankar Devnath Debu1  Nawshin Ahmed1  Tahmina Zerin Mishu1  Faraz Al Zafar1  Naima Nur1  Mashrur Ahmed1  Abdullah Enam2  Mowshomi Mannan Liza3  Sharmin Akter3  Md Utba Rashid4  Soumik Kha Sagar4  Ridwana Maher Manna4  Md Abdullah Saeed Khan5  Miah Md. Akiful Haque6  Sabrina Yesmin Barsha6  Sabiha Hyder6  Alberi Afifa Shifat6  Mohammad Ali Hossain6  Shopnil Roy7  K. M. Tanvir Hassan7  Mohammad Lutfor Rahman7  Koustuv Dalal8 
[1] Department of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh;Department of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh;Covid Vaccine Coordination Cell, Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Dhaka, Bangladesh;Department of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh;Ibn Sina Medical College Hospital, Kallyanpur, 1216, Dhaka, Bangladesh;Department of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh;International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Mohakhali, 1212, Dhaka, Bangladesh;Department of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh;National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine, Mohakhali, 1212, Dhaka, Bangladesh;Department of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh;Public Health Promotion and Development Society (PPDS), 1205, Dhaka, Bangladesh;Institute of Statistical Research and Training (ISRT), University of Dhaka, 1000, Dhaka, Bangladesh;School of Health Sciences, Division of Public Health Science, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden;
关键词: Quality of life;    Health-related quality of life;    Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction;    COVID-19;    Bangladesh;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40249-023-01125-9
 received in 2022-12-27, accepted in 2023-08-01,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic posed a danger to global public health because of the unprecedented physical, mental, social, and environmental impact affecting quality of life (QoL). The study aimed to find the changes in QoL among COVID-19 recovered individuals and explore the determinants of change more than 1 year after recovery in low-resource settings.MethodsCOVID-19 patients from all eight divisions of Bangladesh who were confirmed positive by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction from June 2020 to November 2020 and who subsequently recovered were followed up twice, once immediately after recovery and again 1 year after the first follow-up. The follow-up study was conducted from November 2021 to January 2022 among 2438 individuals using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF). After excluding 48 deaths, 95 were rejected to participate, 618 were inaccessible, and there were 45 cases of incomplete data. Descriptive statistics, paired-sample analyses, generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to test the mean difference in participants’ QoL scores between the two interviews.ResultsMost participants (n = 1710, 70.1%) were male, and one-fourth (24.4%) were older than 46. The average physical domain score decreased significantly from baseline to follow-up, and the average scores in psychological, social, and environmental domains increased significantly at follow-up (P < 0.05). By the GEE equation approach, after adjusting for other factors, we found that older age groups (P < 0.001), being female (P < 0.001), having hospital admission during COVID-19 illness (P < 0.001), and having three or more chronic diseases (P < 0.001), were significantly associated with lower physical and psychological QoL scores. Higher age and female sex [adjusted odd ratio (aOR) = 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0–1.6] were associated with reduced social domain scores on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Urban or semi-urban people were 49% less likely (aOR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.4–0.7) and 32% less likely (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–0.9) to have a reduced QoL score in the psychological domain and the social domain respectively, than rural people. Higher-income people were more likely to experience a decrease in QoL scores in physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. Married people were 1.8 times more likely (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.4) to have a decreased social QoL score. In the second interview, people admitted to hospitals during their COVID-19 infection showed a 1.3 times higher chance (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6) of a decreased environmental QoL score. Almost 13% of participants developed one or more chronic diseases between the first and second interviews. Moreover, 7.9% suffered from reinfection by COVID-19 during this 1-year time.ConclusionsThe present study found that the QoL of COVID-19 recovered people improved 1 year after recovery, particularly in psychological, social, and environmental domains. However, age, sex, the severity of COVID-19, smoking habits, and comorbidities were significantly negatively associated with QoL. Events of reinfection and the emergence of chronic disease were independent determinants of the decline in QoL scores in psychological, social, and physical domains, respectively. Strong policies to prevent and minimize smoking must be implemented in Bangladesh, and we must monitor and manage chronic diseases in people who have recovered from COVID-19.Graphical Abstract

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© National Institute of Parasitic Diseases 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309152585911ZK.pdf 969KB PDF download
Fig. 1 134KB Image download
Fig. 1 162KB Image download
Fig. 1 449KB Image download
13690_2023_1172_Article_IEq6.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

13690_2023_1172_Article_IEq6.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:58次 浏览次数:1次