期刊论文详细信息
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Comparison of two diagnostic strategies for patients with stable chest pain suggestive of chronic coronary syndrome: rationale and design of the double-blind, pragmatic, randomized and controlled OPERATE Trial
Study Protocol
Chang Liu1  Hongliang Cong2  Jia Zhou2  Yahang Tan3  Jie Zhang4  Cun Xie4  Yuanying Liu4  Minghui Wang4  Jia Zhao4  Chengjian Wang4  Chunjie Li4  Ting Xin5  Yankun Liu6  Jianzhong Pang6  Chen Shanfu6  Hao Wang7  Tao Chen8 
[1]Clinical School of Thoracic, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
[2]Clinical School of Thoracic, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
[3]Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
[4]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
[5]Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
[6]Department of Cardiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
[7]Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Second Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China
[8]Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
[9]Department of Emergency, Hebei Petrochina Central Hospital, Langfang, Hebei, China
关键词: Diagnostic strategy;    Cardiac imaging testing;    Stable chest pain;    Chronic coronary syndrome;    Randomized controlled trial;    Coronary computed tomography angiography;    Major adverse cardiovascular event;    Pretest probability;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12872-023-03424-3
 received in 2023-07-07, accepted in 2023-08-01,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundTo achieve potential financial savings and avoid exposing the patients to unnecessary risk, an optimal diagnostic strategy to identify low risk individual who may derive minimal benefit from further cardiac imaging testing (CIT) is important for patients with stable chest pain (SCP) suggestive of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Although several diagnostic strategies have been recommended by the most recent guidelines, few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have prospectively investigated the actual effect of applying these strategies in clinical practice.MethodsOPERATE (OPtimal Evaluation of stable chest pain to Reduce unnecessAry utilization of cardiac imaging TEsting) trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based, 2-arm parallel-group, double-blind, pragmatic and confirmative RCT planning to include 800 subjects with SCP suggestive of CCS. After enrollment, all subjects will be randomized to two arms (2016 U.K. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline-determined and 2019 European Society of Cardiology guideline-determined diagnostic strategy) on a 1:1 basis. According to each strategy, CCTA should be referred and deferred for a subject in high and low risk group, respectively. The primary (effectiveness) endpoint is CCTA without obstructive coronary artery disease. Safety of each strategy will be mainly assessed by 1-year major adverse cardiovascular event rates.DiscussionThe OPERATE trial will provide comparative effectiveness and safety evidences for two different diagnostic strategies for patients with SCP suggestive of CCS, with the intension of improving the diagnostic yield of CCTA at no expense of safety.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrial.org Identifier NCT05640752.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309151434713ZK.pdf 1085KB PDF download
Fig. 1 994KB Image download
Fig. 1 92KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:2次