期刊论文详细信息
EJNMMI Physics
Quantitative analysis of 99mTc-pertechnetate thyroid uptake with a large-field CZT gamma camera: feasibility and comparison between SPECT/CT and planar acquisitions
Original Research
Frédéric Berthier1  Christopher Montemagno2  Tiffany Beaumont3  Nicolas Garnier4  Régis Amblard4  Benjamin Serrano4  Rémy Villeneuve4  Valérie Nataf5  Marc Faraggi5  Benoît Paulmier5  Florent Hugonnet5  François Mocquot5  Matthieu Dietz6 
[1] Department of Biostatistics, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco;Department of Medical Biology, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco;Laboratoire d’évaluation de la dose interne, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France;Medical Physics Department, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco;Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco;Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;
关键词: Thyroid;    Absolute activity;    Uptake;    Quantification;    CZT;    Planar;    SPECT/CT;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40658-023-00566-3
 received in 2023-04-03, accepted in 2023-07-24,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

PurposeThe main objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of a large field Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) camera to estimate thyroid uptake (TU) on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images with and without attenuation correction (Tomo-AC and Tomo-NoAC) compared with Planar acquisition in a series of 23 consecutive patients. The secondary objective was to determine radiation doses for the tracer administration and for the additional Computed Tomography (CT) scan.MethodsCross-calibration factors were determined using a thyroid phantom, for Planar, Tomo-AC and Tomo-NoAC images. Then Planar and SPECT/CT acquisitions centered on the thyroid were performed on 5 anthropomorphic phantoms with activity ranging from 0.4 to 10 MBq, and 23 patients after administration of 79.2 ± 3.7 MBq of [99mTc]-pertechnetate. We estimated the absolute thyroid activity (AThA) for the anthropomorphic phantoms and the TU for the patients. Radiation dose was also determined using International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) reports and VirtualDoseTMCT software.ResultsCross-calibration factors were 66.2 ± 4.9, 60.7 ± 0.7 and 26.5 ± 0.3 counts/(MBq s), respectively, for Planar, Tomo-AC and Tomo-NoAC images. Theoretical and estimated AThA for Planar, Tomo-AC and Tomo-NoAC images were statistically highly correlated (r < 0.99; P < 10–4) and the average of the relative percentage difference between theoretical and estimated AThA were (8.6 ± 17.8), (− 1.3 ± 5.2) and (12.8 ± 5.7) %, respectively. Comparisons between TU based on different pairs of images (Planar vs Tomo-AC, Planar vs Tomo-NoAC and Tomo-AC vs Tomo-NoAC) showed statistically significant correlation (r = 0.972, 0.961 and 0.935, respectively; P < 10–3). Effective and thyroid absorbed doses were, respectively (0.34CT + 0.95NM) mSv, and (3.88CT + 1.74NM) mGy.ConclusionAThA estimation using Planar and SPECT/CT acquisitions on a new generation of CZT large-field cameras is feasible. In addition, TU on SPECT/CT was as accurate as conventional planar acquisition, but the CT induced additional thyroid exposure.Trial registration Name of the registry: Thyroid Uptake Quantification on a New Generation of Gamma Camera (QUANTHYC). Trial number: NCT05049551. Registered September 20, 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT05049551?cntry=MC&draw=2&rank=4.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309150316591ZK.pdf 2123KB PDF download
Fig. 1 345KB Image download
Fig. 3 2197KB Image download
Fig. 4 672KB Image download
Fig. 1 1196KB Image download
40517_2023_263_Article_IEq2.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 2 590KB Image download
Fig. 3 1223KB Image download
Fig. 1 534KB Image download
Fig. 2 575KB Image download
Fig. 1 24KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

40517_2023_263_Article_IEq2.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:2次