期刊论文详细信息
BMC Primary Care
Cannabis dispensary staff approaches to counseling on potential contraindications to cannabis use: insights from a national self-report survey
Research
Devan Kansagara1  Benjamin J. Morasco2  Shannon M. Nugent2  Joanna L. Starrels3  Deepika E. Slawek4  Julia H. Arnsten4  Jane M. Liebschutz5  Robert Feldman5  Steven R. Orris5  Andrew D. Althouse5  Rebecca Rohac5  Jessica S. Merlin6  Hailey W. Bulls6 
[1] Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA;Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA;Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA;Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA;Division of General Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA;Division of General Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA;Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, 10467, Bronx, NY, USA;Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;CHAllenges in Managing and Preventing Pain (CHAMPP) Clinical Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;
关键词: Cannabis;    Medication safety;    Medical cannabis;    Health policy;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-023-02095-5
 received in 2022-04-22, accepted in 2023-06-28,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundLegal cannabis is available in more than half of the United States. Health care professionals (HCPs) rarely give recommendations on dosing or safety of cannabis due to limits imposed by policy and lack of knowledge. Customer-facing cannabis dispensary staff, including clinicians (pharmacists, nurses, physician’s assistants), communicate these recommendations in the absence of HCP recommendations. Little is known about how dispensary staff approach individuals with complex medical and psychiatric comorbidities. Using responses from a national survey, we describe how cannabis dispensary staff counsel customers with medical and psychiatric comorbidities on cannabis use and examine whether state-specific cannabis policy is associated with advice given to customers.MethodsNational, cross-sectional online survey study from February 13, 2020 to October 2, 2020 of dispensary staff at dispensaries that sell delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol containing products. Measures include responses to survey questions about how they approach customers with medical and psychiatric comorbidities; state medicalization score (scale 0-100; higher score indicates more similarity to regulation of traditional pharmacies); legalized adult-use cannabis (yes/no). We conducted multiple mixed effects multivariable logistic regression analyses to understand relationships between state medicalization and dispensary employees’ perspectives.ResultsOf 434 eligible respondents, most were budtenders (40%) or managers (32%), and a minority were clinicians (18%). State medicalization score was not associated with responses to most survey questions. It was associated with increased odds of encouraging customers with medical comorbidities to inform their traditional HCP of cannabis use (Odds ratio [OR]=1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.4, p=0.03) and reduced odds of recommending cannabis for individuals with cannabis use disorder (CUD) (OR=0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.0, p=0.04). Working in a state with legalized adult-use cannabis was associated with recommending traditional health care instead of cannabis in those with serious mental illness (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.7, p=0.04). Less than half of respondents believed they had encountered CUD (49%), and over a quarter did not believe cannabis is addictive (26%).ConclusionsWhen managing cannabis dosing and safety in customers with medical and psychiatric comorbidity, dispensary staff preferred involving individuals’ traditional HCPs. Dispensary staff were skeptical of cannabis being addictive. While state regulations of dispensaries may impact the products individuals have access to, they were not associated with recommendations that dispensary staff gave to customers. Alternative explanations for dispensary recommendations may include regional or store-level variation not captured in this analysis.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309144700657ZK.pdf 1278KB PDF download
42004_2023_934_Article_IEq2.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 6 1034KB Image download
12938_2023_1124_Article_IEq44.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12938_2023_1124_Article_IEq44.gif

Fig. 6

42004_2023_934_Article_IEq2.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次