期刊论文详细信息
BMC Health Services Research
Systems resilience in the implementation of a large-scale suicide prevention intervention: a qualitative study using a multilevel theoretical approach
Research Article
Fiona Shand1  Cecilie Haraldseid-Driftland2  Eline Ree2  Yvonne Zurynski3  Kate Churruca3  Chiara Pomare3  Mitchell Sarkies3  Jeffrey Braithwaite3  Robyn Clay-Williams3  Louise A Ellis3  Maree Saba3  Janet C Long3 
[1] Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia;Centre Faculty of Health Sciences, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway;Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia;
关键词: Resilience;    Resilience in healthcare;    Complexity;    Suicide prevention;    Implementation;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-023-09769-x
 received in 2022-10-31, accepted in 2023-06-22,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundResilience, the capacity to adapt and respond to challenges and disturbances, is now considered fundamental to understanding how healthcare systems maintain required levels of performance across varying conditions. Limited research has examined healthcare resilience in the context of implementing healthcare improvement programs across multiple system levels, particularly within community-based mental health settings or systems. In this study, we explored resilient characteristics across varying system levels (individual, team, management) during the implementation of a large-scale community-based suicide prevention intervention.MethodsSemi-structured interviews (n=53) were conducted with coordinating teams from the four intervention regions and the central implementation management team. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and imported into NVivo for analysis. A thematic analysis of eight transcripts involving thirteen key personnel was conducted using a deductive approach to identify characteristics of resilience across multiple system levels and an inductive approach to uncover both impediments to, and strategies that supported, resilient performance during the implementation of the suicide prevention intervention.ResultsNumerous impediments to resilient performance were identified (e.g., complexity of the intervention, and incompatible goals and priorities between system levels). Consistent with the adopted theoretical framework, indicators of resilient performance relating to anticipation, sensemaking, adaptation and tradeoffs were identified at multiple system levels. At each of the system levels, distinctive strategies were identified that promoted resilience. At the individual and team levels, several key strategies were used by the project coordinators to promote resilience, such as building relationships and networks and carefully prioritising available resources. At the management level, strategies included teambuilding, collaborative learning, building relationships with external stakeholders, monitoring progress and providing feedback. The results also suggested that resilience at one level can shape resilience at other levels in complex ways; most notably we identified that there can be a downside to resilience, with negative consequences including stress and burnout, among individuals enacting resilience.ConclusionsThe importance of considering resilience from a multilevel systems perspective, as well as implications for theory and future research, are discussed.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309141491168ZK.pdf 1214KB PDF download
41116_2023_38_Article_IEq125.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2023_38_Article_IEq152.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

41116_2023_38_Article_IEq152.gif

41116_2023_38_Article_IEq125.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次