Healthcare for individuals without health insurance in Germany – a mixed methods approach to assess the situation and current challenges

International Journal for Equity in Health

Research

Mathilde Stötzler¹  Andrea Kaifie¹ 

[1] Institute for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany;

关键词: Medical care;    Healthcare;    Health insurance;    Health inequality;    Pregnancy;    Uninsured migrants;    Undocumented migrants;    EU citizens;    MediNetz;    Anonymer Krankenschein;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-023-01930-6

 received in 2023-04-06, accepted in 2023-06-02,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundHealth insurance is mandatory in Germany; nevertheless, many individuals there have no health insurance and depend on a parallel healthcare structure. Voluntary associations, such as MediNetz and healthcare vouchers (“Anonymer Krankenschein” - AKS), support uninsured citizens. This study aimed to provide insights into associations, such as MediNetz and AKS that provide healthcare for individuals without health insurance in North Rhine-Westphalia, the largest federal state in Germany.MethodsA mixed methods approach was chosen. A qualitative study using interviews with experts was performed to gain their knowledge and explore the various challenges that AKS and MediNetz associations faced and the possible improvements that could be made. A quantitative survey was conducted to analyse the demographic data of the patients who required AKS or MediNetz’s assistance and the characteristics of each association through a separate questionnaire. Data was received from the association in Aachen, Bielefeld, Bonn, Düsseldorf, and Essen.ResultsMore women than men sought medical care; most were between 25 and 49 years old. The proportion of individuals without residency status accounted for the largest share (53.6%). Common reasons for patients to make contact were acute illnesses (40.2%) and pregnancies (22.3%). Most patients were sent to gynaecologists and general practitioners. Asking the experts, it became apparent that the existing system could not reach the standard of the regular healthcare in Germany. Financial and human resources were insufficient. Therefore, prevention was limited, especially chronically ill patients or patients with a severe illness requiring hospitalisation could not be treated. AKS had advantages compared to MediNetz, as the care came closer to the expected German medical standards.ConclusionsThe results showed a demand for associations providing healthcare for individuals without health insurance. However, the healthcare provided by MediNetz and AKS did not reach the standard of healthcare in Germany and mainly depended on the organisations’ resources. Funded projects such as an AKS combined with clearing centres significantly improved healthcare. Until structural measures are implemented, they can be a transitional solution by spreading nationwide.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

40517_2023_252_Article_IEq125.gif