期刊论文详细信息
BMC Neurology
The efficacy and safety of metoclopramide in relieving acute migraine attacks compared with other anti-migraine drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Research
Hebatallah Mohamed Abdelhay1  Amira Naser Mohammed Alhosini1  Nada Mostafa Al-dardery2  Gehad Taha Abdelwadoud2  Samaher Walied Mohamed3  Mohamed Abd-ElGawad4  Hanaa Abdelmonem4  Mohamed Abdelmonem Kamel4  Ahmed Eissa Ahmed4 
[1] Clinical Oncology Resident at Fayoum University Hospital, Fayoum, Egypt;Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt;Family Medicine Resident at Fayoum University Hospital, Fayoum, Egypt;MBBCh, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt;
关键词: Migraine;    Metoclopramide;    Nausea;    Vomiting;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12883-023-03259-7
 received in 2023-01-05, accepted in 2023-05-25,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMany drugs are prescribed in relieving acute migraine attacks, we aim to compare metoclopramide with other antimigraine drugs.MethodsWe searched online databases like PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science till June 2022 for RCTs that compared metoclopramide alone with placebo or active drugs. The main outcomes were the mean change in headache score and complete headache relief. The secondary outcomes were the rescue medications need, side effects, nausea and recurrence rate. We qualitatively reviewed the outcomes. Then, we performed the network meta-analyses (NMAs) when it was possible. which were done by the Frequentist method using the MetaInsight online software.ResultsSixteen studies were included with a total of 1934 patients: 826 received metoclopramide, 302 received placebo, and 806 received other active drugs. Metoclopramide was effective in reducing headache outcomes even for 24 h. The intravenous route was the most chosen route in the included studies and showed significant positive results regarding headache outcomes; however, the best route whether intramuscular, intravenous, or suppository was not compared in the previous studies. Also, both 10 and 20 mg doses of metoclopramide were effective in improving headache outcomes; however, there was no direct comparison between both doses and the 10 mg dose was the most frequently used dosage.In NMA of headache change after 30 min or 1 h, metoclopramide effect came after granisetron, ketorolac, chlorpromazine, and Dexketoprofen trometamol. Only granisetron’s effect was significantly higher than metoclopramide’s effect which was only significantly higher than placebo and sumatriptan. In headache-free symptoms, only prochlorperazine was non-significantly higher than metoclopramide which was higher than other medications and showed significantly higher effects only with placebo. In rescue medication, metoclopramide’s effect was only non-significantly lower than prochlorperazine and chlorpromazine while its effect was higher than other drugs and showed higher significant effects only than placebo and valproate. In the recurrence rate, studies showed no significant difference between metoclopramide and other drugs. Metoclopramide significantly decreased nausea more than the placebo. Regarding side effects, metoclopramide showed a lower incidence of mild side effects than pethidine and chlorpromazine and showed a higher incidence of mild side effects than placebo, dexamethasone, and ketorolac. The reported extrapyramidal symptoms with metoclopramide were dystonia or akathisia.ConclusionA dose of 10 mg IV Metoclopramide was effective in relieving migraine attacks with minimal side effects. Compared to other active drugs, it only showed a lower significant effect compared with granisetron regarding headache change while it showed significantly higher effects only with placebo in both rescue medication needs and headache-free symptoms and valproate in only rescue medication need. Also, it significantly decreased headache scores more than placebo and sumatriptan. However, more studies are needed to support our results.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309077164191ZK.pdf 3274KB PDF download
MediaObjects/12974_2023_2827_MOESM2_ESM.docx 19KB Other download
MediaObjects/12951_2023_1959_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx 5470KB Other download
MediaObjects/12864_2023_9442_MOESM9_ESM.docx 88KB Other download
Fig. 6 2496KB Image download
Fig. 5 581KB Image download
Fig. 1 326KB Image download
Fig. 12 2718KB Image download
Fig. 2 138KB Image download
Fig. 1 51KB Image download
Fig. 3 99KB Image download
Fig. 1 183KB Image download
Fig. 4 1387KB Image download
Fig. 2 3797KB Image download
MediaObjects/12864_2023_9442_MOESM13_ESM.xlsx 179KB Other download
Fig. 7 783KB Image download
Fig. 24 514KB Image download
Fig. 6 479KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

Fig. 24

Fig. 7

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 12

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:1次