The relevance of pacing strategies in managing symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome

Journal of Translational Medicine

Research

Maria Ghali¹  Camille Ravaiau²  Geoffrey Urbanski²  Valentin Lacombe²  Estelle Delattre²  Alaa Ghali²  Christian Lavigne² 

[1] Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Angers, Angers, France;Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Angers University Hospital, 4 Rue Larrey, 49000, Angers, France;

关键词: Post-COVID syndrome;    Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome;    Pacing strategies;    Adherence;    Outcomes;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12967-023-04229-w

 received in 2023-03-25, accepted in 2023-05-25,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPost-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) shares many features with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). PCS represents a major health issue worldwide because it severely impacts patients’ work activities and their quality of life. In the absence of treatment for both conditions and given the beneficial effect of pacing strategies in ME/CFS, we conducted this study to assess the effectiveness of pacing in PCS patients.MethodsWe retrospectively included patients meeting the World Health Organization definition of PCS who attended the Internal Medicine Department of Angers University Hospital, France between June 2020 and June 2022, and were followed up until December 2022. Pacing strategies were systematically proposed for all patients. Their medical records were reviewed and data related to baseline and follow-up assessments were collected. This included epidemiological characteristics, COVID-19 symptoms and associated conditions, fatigue features, perceived health status, employment activity, and the degree of pacing adherence assessed by the engagement in pacing subscale (EPS). Recovery was defined as the ability to return to work, and improvement was regarded as the reduction of the number and severity of symptoms.ResultsA total of 86 patients were included and followed-up for a median time of 10 [6–13] months. Recovery and improvement rates were 33.7% and 23.3%, respectively. The EPS score was the only variable significantly associated with recovery on multivariate analysis (OR 40.43 [95% CI 6.22–262.6], p < 0.001). Patients who better adhered to pacing (high EPS scores) experienced significantly higher recovery and improvement rates (60–33.3% respectively) than those with low (5.5–5.5% respectively), or moderate (4.3–17.4% respectively) scores.ConclusionOur findings demonstrated that pacing is effective in the management of patients with PCS, and that high levels of adherence to pacing are associated with better outcomes.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

41116_2023_37_Article_IEq129.gif

41116_2023_37_Article_IEq128.gif

41116_2023_37_Article_IEq126.gif

41116_2023_37_Article_IEq122.gif

41116_2023_37_Article_IEq119.gif

42004_2023_919_Article_IEq16.gif