期刊论文详细信息
Sports Medicine - Open
Best Time of Day for Strength and Endurance Training to Improve Health and Performance? A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
Systematic Review
Ralf Roth1  Fabienne Bruggisser1  Wei Wang2  Jingyi Qian3  Frank A. J. L. Scheer3  Raphael Knaier3 
[1] Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland;Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA;Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;Medical Chronobiology Program, Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA;
关键词: Circadian;    Diurnal;    Chronotype;    Endurance;    Strength;    Performance;    Cardiovascular;    Metabolic;    Systematic review;    Meta-analysis;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40798-023-00577-5
 received in 2022-09-30, accepted in 2023-04-30,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundCurrent recommendations for physical exercise include information about the frequency, intensity, type, and duration of exercise. However, to date, there are no recommendations on what time of day one should exercise. The aim was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate if the time of day of exercise training in intervention studies influences the degree of improvements in physical performance or health-related outcomes.MethodsThe databases EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to January 2023. Eligibility criteria were that the studies conducted structured endurance and/or strength training with a minimum of two exercise sessions per week for at least 2 weeks and compared exercise training between at least two different times of the day using a randomized crossover or parallel group design.ResultsFrom 14,125 screened articles, 26 articles were included in the systematic review of which seven were also included in the meta-analyses. Both the qualitative synthesis and the quantitative synthesis (i.e., meta-analysis) provide little evidence for or against the hypothesis that training at a specific time of day leads to more improvements in performance-related or health-related outcomes compared to other times. There was some evidence that there is a benefit when training and testing occur at the same time of day, mainly for performance-related outcomes. Overall, the risk of bias in most studies was high.ConclusionsThe current state of research provides evidence neither for nor against a specific time of the day being more beneficial, but provides evidence for larger effects when there is congruency between training and testing times. This review provides recommendations to improve the design and execution of future studies on this topic.Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021246468).

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202308156725123ZK.pdf 2110KB PDF download
41116_2023_36_Article_IEq278.gif 1KB Image download
40517_2023_256_Article_IEq256.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2023_36_Article_IEq340.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2023_36_Article_IEq344.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_4883_MOESM1_ESM.docx 17KB Other download
【 图 表 】

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq344.gif

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq340.gif

40517_2023_256_Article_IEq256.gif

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq278.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  • [89]
  • [90]
  • [91]
  • [92]
  • [93]
  • [94]
  • [95]
  • [96]
  • [97]
  • [98]
  • [99]
  • [100]
  • [101]
  • [102]
  • [103]
  • [104]
  • [105]
  • [106]
  • [107]
  • [108]
  • [109]
  • [110]
  • [111]
  • [112]
  • [113]
  • [114]
  • [115]
  • [116]
  • [117]
  • [118]
  • [119]
  • [120]
  • [121]
  • [122]
  • [123]
  • [124]
  • [125]
  • [126]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:44次 浏览次数:7次