The impact of COVID-19 on the interpretation of psycho-oncological support trial results: a quasi-experimental approach using the data from the new form of care “Integrated cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (nFC-isPO)”

BMC Health Services Research

Research

Martin Hellmich¹  Anna Hagemeier¹  Anne Adams¹  Natalia Cecon-Stabel²  Antje Dresen²  Theresia Krieger²  Sandra Salm³ 

[1]Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

[2]Medicine Faculty, Human Sciences Faculty, Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

[3]Medicine Faculty, Human Sciences Faculty, Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

[4]Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt, Germany

关键词: Anxiety;    cancer;    COVID-19;    Depression;    HADS;    Mental health;    Psycho-oncology;    Pandemic;    Regression discontinuity design;    Stratification;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-023-09544-y

 received in 2023-02-01, accepted in 2023-05-14,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveIn addition to the common difficulties of ongoing trials, the COVID-19 pandemic posed several challenges to scientists worldwide and created an additional burden for vulnerable patient groups. In the nFC-isPO of individualised treatment for anxiety and depression in newly diagnosed patients with cancer caregivers (e.g. psycho-oncologists) reported elevated HADS scores in newly enrolled patients after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, the question arises whether the pandemic affected HADS scores. Therefore, stratified analyses by the time of enrolment (T1) were performed for patients with 12 months of care (T3).MethodsPatients with 12 months of care (N = 1,140) were analysed. A comparison within the regression discontinuity design according to the time points at which patients completed the baseline (T1) HADS questionnaire was conducted to examine differences between patients recruited before Q2/2020 (pre-pandemic) and after the coronavirus outbreak. Furthermore, mean HADS scores at T1 and T3 for all quarters during the study were compared.ResultsMean T1 and T3 HADS scores of patients with cancer during the pandemic are only slightly higher than those of the pre-pandemic group. No significant treatment effect was observed in either the pre-pandemic (p = 0.5495, Late = 1.7711) or the post-pandemic group (p = 0.9098, LATE=-0.2933). In contrast, the average local treatment effect in the post-pandemic group suggests a minimal decrease in HADS score in the predefined range and thus a positive treatment effect for isPO. Comparison of mean HADS scores at T1 and T3 did not show a large increase by pandemic-related timepoints, however, a decrease of approximately 2–3 points over each quarter at 12 months compared to baseline is observed.ConclusionThe existing nFC-isPO care is resilient to crisis and may counteract external influences such as the Corona pandemic. Accordingly, the pandemic had little influence on the fears of patients with cancer in the nFC-isPO. This emphasises that psycho-oncology is vital for the reduction of stress, anxiety and depression in patients with cancer.Trial RegistrationThe study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry on 30 October 2018 under the ID “DRKS00015326”.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq438.gif

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq436.gif

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq434.gif