期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genomics
Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing technologies as an alternative to low-density SNP chips for genomic selection: a simulation study in layer chickens
Research
Thierry Burlot1  Amandine Varenne1  Florian Herry2  Frédéric Hérault3  David Picard-Druet3  Mathilde Doublet3  Pascale Le Roy3  Frédéric Lecerf3  Laëtitia Lagoutte3  Sophie Allais3  Philippe Bardou4 
[1] NOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, 22960, Plédran, France;NOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, 22960, Plédran, France;PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France;PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France;SIGENAE, GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, 24 chemin de Borde-Rouge - Auzeville Tolosane, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, France;
关键词: Genomic selection;    Layer chicken;    Low-density panel;    Imputation accuracy;    Genomic evaluation accuracy;    NGS;    Genotyping-by-sequencing;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12864-023-09321-5
 received in 2022-05-31, accepted in 2023-04-18,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTo reduce the cost of genomic selection, a low-density (LD) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip can be used in combination with imputation for genotyping selection candidates instead of using a high-density (HD) SNP chip. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have been increasingly used in livestock species but remain expensive for routine use for genomic selection. An alternative and cost-efficient solution is to use restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) techniques to sequence only a fraction of the genome using restriction enzymes. From this perspective, use of RADseq techniques followed by an imputation step on HD chip as alternatives to LD chips for genomic selection was studied in a pure layer line.ResultsGenome reduction and sequencing fragments were identified on reference genome using four restriction enzymes (EcoRI, TaqI, AvaII and PstI) and a double-digest RADseq (ddRADseq) method (TaqI-PstI). The SNPs contained in these fragments were detected from the 20X sequence data of the individuals in our population. Imputation accuracy on HD chip with these genotypes was assessed as the mean correlation between true and imputed genotypes. Several production traits were evaluated using single-step GBLUP methodology. The impact of imputation errors on the ranking of the selection candidates was assessed by comparing a genomic evaluation based on ancestry using true HD or imputed HD genotyping. The relative accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) was investigated by considering the GEBVs estimated on offspring as a reference. With AvaII or PstI and ddRADseq with TaqI and PstI, more than 10 K SNPs were detected in common with the HD SNP chip, resulting in an imputation accuracy greater than 0.97. The impact of imputation errors on genomic evaluation of the breeders was reduced, with a Spearman correlation greater than 0.99. Finally, the relative accuracy of GEBVs was equivalent.ConclusionsRADseq approaches can be interesting alternatives to low-density SNP chips for genomic selection. With more than 10 K SNPs in common with the SNPs of the HD SNP chip, good imputation and genomic evaluation results can be obtained. However, with real data, heterogeneity between individuals with missing data must be considered.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202308154085286ZK.pdf 2015KB PDF download
40517_2023_256_Article_IEq146.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 31 34KB Image download
Fig. 33 166KB Image download
Fig. 5 799KB Image download
MediaObjects/13395_2023_319_MOESM1_ESM.docx 20KB Other download
Fig. 2 140KB Image download
Fig. 6 173KB Image download
41116_2023_36_Article_IEq1.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2023_36_Article_IEq2.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/40249_2023_1099_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx 14KB Other download
【 图 表 】

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq2.gif

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 6

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 33

Fig. 31

40517_2023_256_Article_IEq146.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:1次