Neurorights vs. neuroprediction and lie detection: The imperative limits to criminal law

Frontiers in Psychology

article

José Manuel Díaz Soto¹  Diego Borbón² 

[1] Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Universidad Externado de Colombia;NeuroRights Research Group, The Latin American Observatory of Human Rights and Enterprises, Universidad Externado de Colombia

关键词: neurorights;    Neuroethics;    Neurolaw;    Neuroscience;    Neurotechnologies;    Criminal Law;    Human Rights;    Criminology;    neuromarkers;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030439

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Since 2017, an innovative discussion framework has been created to protect people from potential abusive uses of neurotechnologies. Based on neuroethics, researchers Ienca and Andorno (2017) propose to create four neuro-specific human rights: cognitive liberty, psychological continuity, mental privacy, and integrity. Likewise, Yuste et al. (2017), and nowadays the NeuroRights Foundation, promotes the creation of five NeuroRights: the right to free will, mental privacy, personal identity, fair access to mental augmentation, and protection from bias (NeuroRights Foundation., 2022).

【 授权许可】

CC BY