期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Psychology
What factors affect team members’ evaluation of collaboration in medical teams?
article
Juliane E. Kämmer1  Simone Ehrhard1  Olga Kunina-Habenicht2  Sabine Weber-Schuh1  Stefanie C. Hautz1  Tanja Birrenbach1  Thomas C. Sauter1  Wolf E. Hautz1 
[1] Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern;Psychological Assessment, TU Dortmund University
关键词: collaborative decision making;    perceived teamwork quality;    Healthcare teams;    Structural equation modeling &SEM;    supervisor-trainee interaction;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1031902
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Perceived teamwork quality is associated with numerous work-related outcomes, ranging from team effectiveness to job satisfaction. This study explored what situational and stable factors affect the perceived quality of teamwork during a specific team task: when a medical team comprising a senior (supervisor) and a junior (trainee) physician diagnoses a patient. During a field study in an emergency department, multisource data describing the patients, the diagnosing physicians, and the context were collected, including physicians’ ratings of their teamwork. The relationships between perceived teamwork quality and situational (e.g., workload) and stable (e.g., seniority) factors were estimated in a latent regression model using the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Across the N = 495 patients included, SEM analyses revealed that the patient-specific case clarity and urgency influenced the perceived teamwork quality positively, whereas the work experience of the supervisor influenced the perceived teamwork quality of both supervisor and trainee negatively, albeit to different degrees. Our findings shed light on the complex underpinnings of perceived teamwork quality, a performance-relevant factor that may influence work and organizational effectiveness in healthcare settings.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307160004139ZK.pdf 1057KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次