Individual differences in literary reading: Dimensions or categories

Psihologija

article

Filip Nenadić¹  Milan Oljača² 

[1] Alberta Phonetics Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta;Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad

关键词: literary reading;    receptiveness;    latent class analysis;    expertise;    individual differences;   

DOI  :  10.2298/PSI180130035N

学科分类：内科医学

来源: Drustvo Psihologa Srbije

【 摘 要 】

Literary text reading has long been a subject of empirical research. Various measures of reader differences and reader typologies were suggested, with the most prominent being studies of literary expertise, and studies employing Literary Response Questionnaire (LRQ; Miall & Kuiken, 1995). Literary expertise is difficult to define and fails to account for potential differences within non-experts. LRQ and similar dimensional approaches neglect the possibility that a salient reader typology does exist. The main goal of this study is to test whether a salient reader classification can be formed based on participant responses to questionnaires and to test how this classification corresponds to self-reported reader expertise. Based on responses from 741 participants (78.41% female, mean age = 24.31), we test the factor structure of LRQ in its Serbian translation and find moderate, acceptable fit. We also present our own Receptiveness to Literature Questionnaire (UPK) with two factors named Thorough Reading and Reading for Pleasure. Finally, we discuss relations between LRQ and UPK, offer classifications of readers formed on participant factor scores, and test the congruence between these classes and self-reported participant expertise. Our results indicate that a dimensional approach should be favored over forming categories of readers.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-SA