Perceived Barriers to Increasing Diversity within Oculofacial Plastic Surgery

Journal of Academic Ophthalmology

article

Johsias A. Maru¹  Nicole D. Carvajal¹  Alejandra G. de Alba Campomanes²  Neeti Parikh²  Davin C. Ashraf²  Robert C. Kersten²  Bryan J. Winn²  M. Reza Vagefi²  Seanna R. Grob² 

[1] School of Medicine, University of California;Department of Ophthalmology, University of California;Ophthalmology Section, Surgical Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System

关键词: oculofacial plastic surgery;    oculoplastics;    underrepresented;    UiM;    underrepresented in medicine;    barriers;    fellowship;    minority;   

DOI  :  10.1055/s-0042-1758561

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Thieme

【 摘 要 】

Purpose Physician diversity is limited in ophthalmology and oculofacial plastic surgery. Determination of barriers within the application process for oculofacial plastic surgery may help target efforts to improve the recruitment of underrepresented groups. This study aimed to illuminate perceived barriers to increasing diversity in oculofacial plastic surgery trainees, according to the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) fellows and fellowship program directors (FPDs).Methods During the month of February 2021, we sent surveys out to 54 current oculofacial plastic surgery fellows and 56 FPDs at 56 oculofacial plastic surgery programs recognized by the ASOPRS nationwide using a 15-question Qualtrics survey.Results Sixty-three individuals (57%) responded to the survey: 34 fellows (63%) and 29 FPDs (52%). Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 68% of FPDs identified as non-underrepresented in medicine (UiM). Forty-four percent of fellows and 25% of FPDs identified as men. FPDs most commonly noted, “Not enough minorities applying to our program” and “The objective data (Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program score, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step scores, clinical honors, Alpha Omega Alpha status, letter of recommendation) for minority applicants often do not meet the threshold required to offer an interview or to be ranked to match” as barriers. Among fellows, the lowest-rated considerations when applying to oculofacial plastic surgery were “Racially/ethnically diverse faculty” and “Perceptions of minority candidates by fellowship programs,” whereas “Likelihood of matching in program of choice” was ranked highest in considerations. Fellows identifying as men indicated greater concern for “Financial factors related to fellowship (e.g., loans, salary, cost of living, or cost of interviewing)” compared to fellows identifying as women who noted greater concern for “Program or preceptor acceptance of starting or having a family during fellowship.”Conclusion Responses from FPDs suggest that efforts focused on recruiting and supporting diverse students to medicine and ophthalmology, mentoring applicants interested in oculofacial plastic surgery, and restructuring the application process to decrease bias, may improve diversity within the subspecialty. The lack of UiM representation in this study, 6% fellows and 7.4% FPDs identified as UiM, shows both the stark underrepresentation and the need for further research into this topic.

【 授权许可】

CC BY|CC BY-NC-ND