Engagement and social acceptance in genome editing for human benefit: Reflections on research and practice in a global context

Wellcome Open Research

article

Sebastián Barbosa¹  Lea Pare Toe²  Delphine Thizy³  Manjulika Vaz⁴  Lucy Carter⁵ 

[1] Ministry of Science;Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé;Imperial College London;St John’s Research Institute, St John's Medical College;CSIRO Land and Water

关键词: Public engagement;    gene drives;    genome editing;    social acceptance;   

DOI  :  10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16260.2

学科分类：内科医学

来源: Wellcome

【 摘 要 】

While there are both practical and ethical reasons for public engagement in science and innovation, real-world detailed examples of engagement practice and the lessons to come from these are still hard to find. This paper showcases three contextually diverse case studies of engagement practice. Case 1 recounts the experiences of a government-funded initiative to involve scientists and policy makers as science communicators for the purpose of engaging the Argentine public on gene editing. Case 2 describes the research methodologies used to elicit diverse stakeholder views in the face of political uncertainty and institutional distrust in India. Finally, case 3 unpacks the tensions and gaps with existing international guidelines for ensuring local voices are respected in community decision-making in Burkina Faso. Each case shares its own compelling rationale for selecting the engagement method chosen and details the challenges encountered along the way. Each case shares its vision for creating legitimate opportunities for broader societal involvement in the planning, conduct and delivery of responsible science. These cases demonstrate the nuances, sensitivities and challenges of engaging with publics and broader stakeholders in discussions about genome editing for human benefit.

【 授权许可】

CC BY