Cardiometry | |
Comparing the efficiency of heart disease prediction using novel random forest, logistic regression and decision tree and SVM algorithms | |
article | |
P. Prasanna Sai Teja1  Veeramani T1  | |
[1] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University | |
关键词: Logistic Regression; Decision Tree; Random Forest; Support Vector Machine; Heart Disease Prediction; Data Mining; | |
DOI : 10.18137/cardiometry.2022.25.14911499 | |
学科分类:环境科学(综合) | |
来源: Russian New University | |
![]() |
【 摘 要 】
Aim: The aim of the work is to evaluate the accuracy and precision in predicting heart disease using Support Vector Machine (SVM) , Random forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT) Classification algorithms. Materials and Methods: Classification algorithm is appealed on a heart dataset which consists of 180 records. A framework for heart disease prediction in the medical sector comparing Random forest, Logistic Regression , Decision Tree and SVM classifiers has been proposed and developed. The sample size was calculated as 55 in each group using G power 80%. Sample size was calculated using clincalc analysis, with alpha and beta values 0.05 and 0.5, 95% confidence, pretest power 80% and enrolment ratio 1. Results: The Novel Random Forest Algorithm (92.13%) , Support Vector Machine (62.51%) , Logistic Regression (84.89%), Decision Tree (86.25%) classifiers produce respectively. SVM, RF exists a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.001,p=.004;p0.05) both with confidence interval 95%. Hence Random forest is better than SVM, RF, DT classifiers. Conclusion: The results show that the performance of RF is better when compared with SVM, LR and DT in terms of both precision and accuracy.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202307120003527ZK.pdf | 380KB | ![]() |