Biomechanical evaluation of a novel double rip-stop technique with medial row knots for rotator cuff repair: an in vitro study

Bone & Joint Research

article

Zhanwen Wang¹  Hong Li¹  Zeling Long¹  Subin Lin¹  Andrew R. Thoreson¹  Steven L. Moran¹  Anne Gingery¹  Peter C. Amadio¹  Scott P. Steinmann¹  Chunfeng Zhao¹ 

[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic

关键词: Rotator cuff;    Suture-bridge;    Double rip-stop;    Medial row knot;    Biomechanics;   

DOI  :  10.1302/2046-3758.96.BJR-2019-0196.R1

学科分类：骨科学

来源: British Editorial Society Of Bone And Joint Surgery

【 摘 要 】

AimsMany biomechanical studies have shown that the weakest biomechanical point of a rotator cuff repair is the suture-tendon interface at the medial row. We developed a novel double rip-stop (DRS) technique to enhance the strength at the medial row for rotator cuff repair. The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the DRS technique with the conventional suture-bridge (SB) technique and to evaluate the biomechanical performance of the DRS technique with medial row knots.MethodsA total of 24 fresh-frozen porcine shoulders were used. The infraspinatus tendons were sharply dissected and randomly repaired by one of three techniques: SB repair (SB group), DRS repair (DRS group), and DRS with medial row knots repair (DRSK group). Specimens were tested to failure. In addition, 3 mm gap formation was measured and ultimate failure load, stiffness, and failure modes were recorded.ResultsThe mean load to create a 3 mm gap formation in the DRSK and DRS groups was significantly higher than in the SB group. The DRSK group had the highest load to failure with a mean ultimate failure load of 395.0 N (SD 56.8) compared to the SB and DRS groups, which recorded 147.1 N (SD 34.3) and 285.9 N (SD 89.8), respectively (p < 0.001 for both). The DRS group showed a significantly higher mean failure load than the SB group (p = 0.006). Both the DRS and DRSK groups showed significantly higher mean stiffness than the SB group.ConclusionThe biomechanical properties of the DRS technique were significantly improved compared to the SB technique. The DRS technique with medial row knots showed superior biomechanical performance than the DRS technique alone.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC