Including autapomorphies is important for paleontological tip-dating with clocklike data, but not with non-clock data

PeerJ

article

Nicholas J. Matzke¹  Randall B. Irmis³ 

[1] Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University;School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland;Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah;Natural History Museum of Utah

关键词: Total-evidence dating;    Parsimony;    Tip-dating;    Eureptilia;    Autapomorphies;    BEASTmasteR;    Bayesian phylogenetics;    Phylogenetic dating;    Ascertainment bias;    Morphological clock;   

DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.4553

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Inra

【 摘 要 】

Tip-dating, where fossils are included as dated terminal taxa in Bayesian dating inference, is an increasingly popular method. Data for these studies often come from morphological character matrices originally developed for non-dated, and usually parsimony, analyses. In parsimony, only shared derived characters (synapomorphies) provide grouping information, so many character matrices have an ascertainment bias: they omit autapomorphies (unique derived character states), which are considered uninformative. There has been no study of the effect of this ascertainment bias in tip-dating, but autapomorphies can be informative in model-based inference. We expected that excluding autapomorphies would shorten the morphological branchlengths of terminal branches, and thus bias downwards the time branchlengths inferred in tip-dating. We tested for this effect using a matrix for Carboniferous-Permian eureptiles where all autapomorphies had been deliberately coded. Surprisingly, date estimates are virtually unchanged when autapomorphies are excluded, although we find large changes in morphological rate estimates and small effects on topological and dating confidence. We hypothesized that the puzzling lack of effect on dating was caused by the non-clock nature of the eureptile data. We confirm this explanation by simulating strict clock and non-clock datasets, showing that autapomorphy exclusion biases dating only for the clocklike case. A theoretical solution to ascertainment bias is computing the ascertainment bias correction (Mkparsinf), but we explore this correction in detail, and show that it is computationally impractical for typical datasets with many character states and taxa. Therefore we recommend that palaeontologists collect autapomorphies whenever possible when assembling character matrices.

【 授权许可】

CC BY