期刊论文详细信息
PeerJ
Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
article
Luke Hughes1  Owen Jeffries1  Mark Waldron1  Ben Rosenblatt2  Conor Gissane1  Bruce Paton3  Stephen D. Patterson1 
[1] School of Sport Health & Applied Science, St Mary’s University;St. George’s Park;Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, University College London, University of London
关键词: Blood flow restriction exercise;    Ischemic preconditioning;    Occlusion;    Limb occlusion pressure;    Kaatsu;   
DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.4697
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Inra
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influence level of occlusion in different positions during BFR and IPC. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of body position on AOP. Methods Fifty healthy individuals (age = 29 ± 6 y) underwent AOP measurements on the dominant lower-limb in supine, seated and standing positions in a randomised order. AOP was measured automatically using the Delfi Personalised Tourniquet System device, with each measurement separated by 5 min of rest. Results Arterial occlusive pressure was significantly lower in the supine position compared to the seated position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and standing position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 241.50 ± 49.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). AOP was significantly higher in the standing position compared to the seated position (241.50 ± 49.3 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). Discussion Arterial occlusive pressure measurement is body position dependent, thus for accurate prescription of occlusion pressure during surgery, BFR and IPC, AOP should be measured in the position intended for subsequent application of occlusion.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307100012631ZK.pdf 831KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:0次