期刊论文详细信息
PeerJ
Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera
article
Xiuying Liu1  Chenzhou Liu1  Zhaoyong Shi1  Qingrui Chang4 
[1] College of Agriculture, Henan University of Science and Technology;Luoyang Key Laboratory of Symbiotic Microorganism and Green Development/Luoyang Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Environmental Ecology, Luoyang, Henan Province;Research Center of Forestry Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan Province;College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province
关键词: Anthocyanin content;    Reflectance spectra;    Back-propagation neural network;    Partial least squares analysis;    Principal component analysis;   
DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.7997
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Inra
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The anthocyanin content in leaves can reveal valuable information about a plant’s physiological status and its responses to stress. Therefore, it is of great value to accurately and efficiently determine anthocyanin content in leaves. The selection of calibration method is a major factor which can influence the accuracy of measurement with visible and near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Three multivariate calibrations including principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) were adopted for the development of determination models of leaf anthocyanin content using reflectance spectra data (450–600 nm) in Prunus cerasifera and then the performance of these models was compared for three multivariate calibrations. Certain principal components (PCs) and latent variables (LVs) were used as input for the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model. The results showed that the best PCR and PLSR models were obtained by standard normal variate (SNV), and BPNN models outperformed both the PCR and PLSR models. The coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEp), and the residual prediction deviation (RPD) values for the validation set were 0.920, 0.274, and 3.439, respectively, for the BPNN-PCs model, and 0.922, 0.270, and 3.489, respectively, for the BPNN-LVs model. Visible spectroscopy combined with BPNN was successfully applied to determine leaf anthocyanin content in P. cerasifera and the performance of the BPNN-LVs model was the best. The use of the BPNN-LVs model and visible spectroscopy showed significant potential for the nondestructive determination of leaf anthocyanin content in plants.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307100009412ZK.pdf 528KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:11次 浏览次数:3次