PeerJ | |
Resampling-based methods for biologists | |
article | |
John R. Fieberg1  Kelsey Vitense1  Douglas H. Johnson1  | |
[1] Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota | |
关键词: Bootstrap; Model uncertainty; Permutation; Randomization; Replication; Resampling; Statistical inference; | |
DOI : 10.7717/peerj.9089 | |
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合) | |
来源: Inra | |
【 摘 要 】
Ecological data often violate common assumptions of traditional parametric statistics (e.g., that residuals are Normally distributed, have constant variance, and cases are independent). Modern statistical methods are well equipped to handle these complications, but they can be challenging for non-statisticians to understand and implement. Rather than default to increasingly complex statistical methods, resampling-based methods can sometimes provide an alternative method for performing statistical inference, while also facilitating a deeper understanding of foundational concepts in frequentist statistics (e.g., sampling distributions, confidence intervals, p-values). Using simple examples and case studies, we demonstrate how resampling-based methods can help elucidate core statistical concepts and provide alternative methods for tackling challenging problems across a broad range of ecological applications.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202307100008310ZK.pdf | 2036KB | download |