期刊论文详细信息
PeerJ
Determining the influencing factors of preferential flow in ground fissures for coal mine dump eco-engineering
article
Yexin Li1  Gang Lv1  Hongbo Shao3  Quanhou Dai6  Xinpeng Du1  Dong Liang1  Shaoping Kuang5  Daohan Wang1 
[1] College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University;School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology;Salt-Soil Agricultural Center, Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environment in the Lower Reaches of Yangtze River Plain, Institute of Agriculture Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University;College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Technology;College of Forestry, Guizhou University
关键词: Preferential flow;    Eco-engineering dump;    Dye tracer;    Ground fissures;    Roots;   
DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.10547
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Inra
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Ground fissures (GF), appearing in front of dumps, are one of the most obvious and harmful geological hazards in coal mining areas. Studying preferential flow and its influencing factors in the ground fissures of dumps may provide basic scientific support for understanding the rapid movement of water and vegetation restoration and reconstruction in mining areas. Based on field surveys of ground fissures, three typical ground fissures were selected in the studied dump. The morphological characteristics of preferential flow for ground fissures were determined through field dye tracing, laboratory experiments, and image processing technology. The results indicated that the lengths of the three ground fissures ranged from 104.84 cm to 120.83 cm, and the widths ranged from 2.86 cm to 9.85 cm. All of the ground fissure area densities were less than 10%, and the proportion of ground fissure surface area was small in the dump. The maximum fissure depth was 47 cm, and the minimum was 16 cm. The ground fissure widths ranged from 0 cm to 14.98 cm, and the fissure width and fissure width-to-depth ratios decreased with increasing soil depth. The stained area was greater than 90% in the 0–5 cm soil layers of the three fissures, and water movement was dominated by matrix flow. The stained width decreased from 90 cm to 20 cm with increasing soil depth. The preferential flow was mainly concentrated on both sides of the fissure, which was distributed as a “T” shape. The preferential flow stained area ratios were 27.23%, 31.97%, and 30.73%, respectively, and these values decreased with increasing soil depth. The maximum stained depths of the preferential flow among the three fissures were different, and the maximum stained depth of GF II was significantly larger than that of GF I and GF III (P < 0.05). The stained path numbers of the three fissures ranged from 0 to 49. With increasing soil depth, the stained path number first increased and then decreased. The stained path widths of the three fissures ranged from 0 cm to 90 cm. With the increase in soil depth, the stained path width decreased. The stained area ratio was significantly positively correlated with ground fissure width, the ground fissure width-to-depth ratio, soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, soil organic matter, and sand content and was significantly negatively correlated with soil water content and clay content. The stained path number was significantly positively correlated with ground fissure width, the ground fissure width-to-depth ratio, soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil organic matter. The stained path width was significantly positively correlated with the ground fissure width-to-depth ratio, soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, soil organic matter and sand content and was significantly negatively correlated with clay content. Plant roots could significantly increase the stained area ratio, stained path number, and width and promote the formation and development of preferential flow.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307100006839ZK.pdf 15953KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:11次 浏览次数:2次