Comparison of an exercise program with and without manual therapy for patients with chronic neck pain and upper cervical rotation restriction. Randomized controlled trial

PeerJ

article

Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz¹  Miguel Malo-Urriés²  María Orosia Lucha-López²  Carlos López-de-Celis¹  Albert Pérez-Bellmunt¹  Jaime Corral-de-Toro²  César Hidalgo-García² 

[1] Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. ACTIUM Anatomy Group. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya;Department of Physiatry and Nursing. Physiotherapy Research Unit. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza;Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina

关键词: Physical therapy;    Manipulation;    Physiotherapy;    Training;    Neck pain;   

DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.12546

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Inra

【 摘 要 】

Background Cervical exercise has been shown to be an effective treatment for neck pain, but there is still a need for more clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of adding manual therapy to the exercise approach. There is a lack of evidence on the effect of these techniques in patients with neck pain and upper cervical rotation restriction. Purpose To compare the effectiveness of adding manual therapy to a cervical exercise protocol for the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain and upper cervical rotation restriction. Methods Single-blind randomized clinical trial. Fifty-eight subjects: 29 for the Manual Therapy+Exercise (MT+Exercise) Group and 29 for the Exercise group. Neck disability index, pain intensity (0–10), pressure pain threshold (kPa), flexion-rotation test (°), and cervical range of motion (°) were measured at the beginning and at the end of the intervention, and at 3-and 6-month follow-ups. The MT+Exercise Group received one 20-min session of manual therapy and exercise once a week for 4 weeks and home exercise. The Exercise Group received one 20-min session of exercise once a week for 4 weeks and home exercise. Results The MT+Exercise Group showed significant better values post-intervention in all variables: neck disability index: 0% patient with moderate, severe, or complete disability compared to 31% in the Exercise Group (p = 0.000) at 6-months; flexion-rotation test (p = 0.000) and pain intensity (p = 0.000) from the first follow-up to the end of the study; cervical flexion (p = 0.002), extension (p = 0.002), right lateral-flexion (p = 0.000), left lateral-flexion (p = 0.001), right rotation (p = 0.000) and left rotation (p = 0.005) at 6-months of the study, except for flexion, with significative changes from 3-months of follow up; pressure pain threshold from the first follow-up to the end of the study (p values range: 0.003–0.000). Conclusion Four 20-min sessions of manual therapy and exercise, along with a home-exercise program, was found to be more effective than an exercise protocol and a home-exercise program in improving the neck disability index, flexion-rotation test, pain intensity, and pressure pain threshold, in the short, medium, and medium-long term in patients with chronic neck pain and upper rotation restriction. Cervical range of motion improved with the addition of manual therapy in the medium and medium-long term. The high dropout rate may have compromised the external validity of the study.

【 授权许可】

CC BY