Reliability of kettlebell swing one and five repetition maximum

PeerJ

article

James A. Ross¹  Justin W. L. Keogh²  Christian Lorenzen¹ 

[1] School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University;Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute of Health & Sport, Bond University;Manipal Academy of Higher Education Mangalore, Kasturba Medical College;Sports Performance Research Centre New Zealand, AUT University

关键词: Resistance training;    Strength training;    Exercise;    1RM;    5RM;    Test-retest;   

DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.14370

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Inra

【 摘 要 】

Background Research into the kettlebell swing has increased in the last decade. There has been a paucity of literature assessing an individual’s ability to perform the kettlebell swing exercise. The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of the one and five repetition maximum (1RM and 5RM) kettlebell swing. Materials & Methods Twenty four recreational resistance-trained participants performed an isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) and two familiarization sessions followed by three test sessions for each RM load approximately one week apart, using a custom-built plate-loaded kettlebell. On each test occasion, subjects completed a series of warm-up sets followed by 3–4 progressively heavier kettlebell swings to a standardized height until 1RM or 5RM was reached. Test-retest reliability was calculated using the intra-class correlation (ICC) and typical error was represented as the coefficient of variation (CV%) with 90% confidence limits (90% CL). The smallest worthwhile change (SWC%) representing the smallest change of practical importance, was calculated as 0.2 × between-subject standard deviation. The relationship of kettlebell swing performance and maximum strength was determined by Pearson correlation with ±90% CL between the absolute peak force recorded during IMTP and 1RM or 5RM. Results Results demonstrated a high test-retest reliability for both the 1RM (ICC = 0.97, 90% CL [0.95–0.99]; CV = 2.7%, 90% CL [2.2–3.7%]) and 5RM (ICC = 0.98, 90% CL [0.96–0.99]; CV = 2.4%, 90% CL [1.9–3.3%]), respectively. The CV% was lower than the SWC for both the 1RM (SWC = 2.8%, 90% CL [1.9–3.5]) and 5RM (SWC = 2.9%, 90% CL [1.9–3.6]) kettlebell swing. The correlation between IMTP absolute peak force and the 1RM (r = 0.69, 90% CL 0.43–0.83) was large and very large for the 5RM (r = 0.75, 90% CL [0.55–0.87]). Conclusions 3.6 kg represent a practically important difference, which is the upper limit of the 90% CL.

【 授权许可】

CC BY