期刊论文详细信息
Acta Medica Marisiensis
Comparative analysis of mandibular changes after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four premolars: A digital cephalometric study
article
Anithab Alex1  Keerthan Shashidhar1  M N Kuttappa1  Krishna U S Nayak1  Sai Kalyan Menta1  A Anushree1 
[1] Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences;NITTE Deemed to be University
关键词: corrective orthodontics;    premolar;    chin;    tooth extraction;    mandible;   
DOI  :  10.2478/amma-2022-0012
来源: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objective: To compare and evaluate the cephalometric hard and soft tissue changes of mandible after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolar. Methodology: 60 individuals with Class I skeletal pattern were selected as per inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups: 30 in the extraction group and 30 in the non-extraction group. Each group consists of 15 males and 15 females. Pre-treatment and post-treatment lateral cephalograms of the selected subjects were obtained, analysed and compared to assess the changes might have occurred. Descriptive statistics of the explanatory and outcome variables were calculated by mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables. Paired t test was applied to check the statistical difference of pre-treatment and post-treatment cephalometric parameters within the group (Extraction and non-extraction). Unpaired t test was used to check the statistical difference between extraction and non-extraction groups. The level of significance is set at 5%. Results: B point moved backward with lower incisor retraction. N-A-Pog shows a statistically significant decrease in the extraction group (P=0.003). B-NP shows a statistically significant decrease in extraction group (P=0.001). N- A’-Pog’ shows a statistically significant increase in non-extraction group (P=0.046).

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307090004475ZK.pdf 312KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:0次