Comparative evaluation of three different intraorifice barrier on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study

Indian Journal of Dental Sciences

article

Mitali Jain¹  Anika Mittal¹  Aditi Dhaundiyal¹  Nidhi Sharma¹  Tuba Siddiqui¹  Vaibhav Kelkar¹ 

[1] Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital

关键词: Cention N;    endodontically treated teeth;    fracture resistance;    intraorifice barrier;    mineral trioxide aggregate;    nanohybrid composite;   

DOI  :  10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_4_20

学科分类：生物科学（综合）

来源: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications

【 摘 要 】

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of three different intraorifice barrier materials on resistance to fracture of obturated teeth with seal-apex sealer. Subjects and Methods: Eighty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated to approximately similar dimension, and prepared and obturated with gutta-percha and seal-apex sealer. For the placement of different intraorifice barrier materials, the coronal 3-mm gutta-percha was removed except for the control group. The specimens were divided into four groups ( n = twenty) on the basis of the intraorifice barrier material used. Group I: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Group II: Cention N, Group III: Nanohybrid composite, Group IV: Control, Fracture resistance of the specimens was tested. Statistical Analysis Used: It was done by the statistical software SPSS version 16.0. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test and independent t -test was used. Results: Fracture resistance of endodontically treated tooth was significantly affected by the type of intraorifice barrier used ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of nanohybrid composite significantly improved fracture resistance followed by cention N and MTA as compared to the control group.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC-SA