Stakeholder preferences for pangolin conservation interventions in south-east Nigeria

People and Nature

article

Charles A. Emogor¹  Aiora Zabala⁵  Patience Onyeche Adaje⁷  Douglas Clark⁸  Kristian Steensen Nielsen⁹  Rachel Carmenta^1,10 

[1] Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge;IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group, Zoological Society of London;Wildlife Conservation Society, Calabar;Pangolin Protection Network ,(Pangolino), Calabar;The Open University;Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge;Department of Social and Environmental Forestry, College of Forestry and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Makurdi;School of Environment & Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan;Department of Management, Society and Communication, Copenhagen Business School;School of International Development and the Tyndall Centre, University of East Anglia

关键词: behaviour change interventions;    community-based conservation;    conservation governance;    illegal wildlife trade;    Pholidota;    poaching;   

DOI  :  10.1002/pan3.10477

学科分类：护理学

来源: Wiley

【 摘 要 】

The overexploitation of biological resources severely threatens many species, requiring urgent and effective conservation interventions. Such interventions sometimes require governance structures that incorporate pluralist perspectives and collaborative decision-making, especially in complex, multi-faceted and multi-scale issues like the illegal trade in pangolins. We used Q-methodology to provide evidence to inform interventions for pangolin conservation in south-east Nigeria. We sampled stakeholder groups associated with pangolin use and protection, including hunters, wild meat traders and Nigeria Customs Service employees, to elicit their opinion and knowledge on the use and perceptions of pangolins and their preferences for interventions to reduce pangolin decline. We found that the local consumption of pangolin meat as food is the primary driver of poaching in the region. This contradicts popular opinions that pangolins are specifically targeted for international trade, revealing an opportunity for site-level behaviour change interventions. The different stakeholder groups identified awareness-raising campaigns, law enforcement, community stewardship programs and ecotourism as preferred interventions, whose effectiveness we attempted to assess using reported case studies. We observed different perspectives between people associated with pangolin poaching and use (predominantly those living around pangolin habitats, including hunters and wild meat traders) and those working to protect them (such as conservation organisations and Nigeria Customs Service employees). For example, the first group supported community stewardship programs, while the latter preferred awareness-raising and law enforcement efforts. This divergence in perspectives underpins the need for a combination of targeted interventions at the site level to engage different stakeholders while highlighting the potential challenges to collaborative decision-making for species threatened by illegal wildlife trade. Policy implications. Our results stress the importance of targeted and context-specific conservation interventions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

【 授权许可】

CC BY