Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study

The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

article

Helen Strongman¹  Emily Herrett¹  Rod Jackson²  Michael Sweeting³  Alexander R Lyon⁴  Susannah Stanway⁵  Claire Lawson⁶  Umesh Kadam⁷  Liam Smeeth¹  Krishnan Bhaskaran¹ 

[1] Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine;Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland;Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester;National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital;Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital;Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester;Department of Health Sciences and Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester

关键词: cancer survivors;    cardiovascular risk score;    cohort studies;    primary health care;   

DOI  :  10.3399/BJGP.2022.0088

学科分类：卫生学

来源: Royal College of General Practitioners

【 摘 要 】

Background Cardiovascular risks are raised in cancer survivors but cancer history is not included in cardiovascular risk scores that inform preventive decisions.Aim To assess whether cancer diagnosis should be included in cardiovascular risk scores.Design and setting Cohort study using data from English general practices linked to hospital, cancer registration, and death registration data from 1990 to 2015.Method Adults alive 1 year after a first cancer diagnosis and age, sex, general practice, and calendar- time matched cancer-free individuals were included. Individuals with 10% relative difference with P<0.01) was assessed.Results In total, 81 420 cancer survivors and 413 547 cancer-free individuals were followed for a median 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8– 9.1) and 6.3 years (IQR 3.5–10.2), respectively. Including a 1-year cancer survivorship variable in a QRISK3-based model met the threshold for inclusion for males (independent hazard ratio [iHR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.20, P<0.001) but not females (iHR 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14, P = 0.02). When including cancer type, the threshold was met for both sexes with history of haematological cancer (males: iHR 1.27, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.40, P <0.001; females: iHR 1.59, 95% CI = 1.32 to 1.91, P<0.001) and for males but not females with history of solid cancers (males: iHR 1.13, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.18, P <0.001; females: iHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.10, P = 0.19).Conclusion Developers should consider including cancer history variables in future cardiovascular risk models.

【 授权许可】

Free