期刊论文详细信息
The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Performance of the SCORE and Globorisk cardiovascular risk prediction models: a prospective cohort study in Dutch general practice
article
Merle CA Schoofs1  Reinier P Akkermans2  Wim JC de Grauw1  Bianca WM Schalk1  Ineke van Dis3  Judith Tjin-A-Ton4  Erik WMA Bischoff1  Marion CJ Biermans1 
[1] Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center;Department of Primary and Community Care and Department of IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center;Dutch Heart Foundation;GP practice Frakking & Tjin- A-Ton
关键词: cardiovascular disease;    prospective studies;    primary health care;    risk equation;   
DOI  :  10.3399/BJGP.2021.0726
学科分类:卫生学
来源: Royal College of General Practitioners
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background GPs frequently use 10-year-risk estimations of cardiovascular disease (CVD) to identify high- risk patients.Aim To assess the performance of four models for predicting the 10-year risk of CVD in Dutch general practice.Design and setting Prospective cohort study. Routine data (2009– 2019) was used from 46 Dutch general practices linked to cause of death statistics.Method The outcome measures were fatal CVD for SCORE and first diagnosis of fatal or non- fatal CVD for SCORE fatal and non-fatal (SCORE- FNF), Globorisk-laboratory, and Globorisk-office. Model performance was assessed by examining discrimination and calibration.Results The final number of patients for risk prediction was 1981 for SCORE and SCORE-FNF, 3588 for Globorisk-laboratory, and 4399 for Globorisk- office. The observed percentage of events was 18.6% (n = 353) for SCORE- FNF, 6.9% (n = 230) for Globorisk-laboratory, 7.9% (n = 323) for Globorisk-office, and 0.3% (n = 5) for SCORE. The models showed poor discrimination and calibration. The performance of SCORE could not be examined because of the limited number of fatal CVD events. SCORE-FNF, the model that is currently used for risk prediction of fatal plus non-fatal CVD in Dutch general practice, was found to underestimate the risk in all deciles of predicted risks.Conclusion Wide eligibility criteria and a broad outcome measure contribute to the model applicability in daily practice. The restriction to fatal CVD outcomes of SCORE renders it less usable in routine Dutch general practice. The models seriously underestimate the 10-year risk of fatal plus non-fatal CVD in Dutch general practice. The poor model performance is possibly because of differences between patients that are eligible for risk prediction and the population that was used for model development. In addition, selection of higher-risk patients for CVD risk assessment by GPs may also contribute to the poor model performance.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307060001049ZK.pdf 174KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次