Immune checkpoint inhibitors beyond first-line progression with prior immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Journal of Thoracic Disease

article

Manyi Xu¹  Yue Hao¹  Xiaohong Zeng²  Jinfei Si¹  Zhengbo Song² 

[1] The Second Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University;Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital;Wenzhou Medical University

关键词: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC);    immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP);    immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs);    efficacy;   

DOI  :  10.21037/jtd-22-1611

学科分类：呼吸医学

来源: Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company

【 摘 要 】

Background: Immunotherapy, monotherapy, and immunotherapy plus platinum-based chemotherapy are the standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with negative driver genes. However, the impact of similar continuing immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP) of first-line immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC has not yet been shown. This study aimed to estimate the impact of immunotherapy beyond first-line progression (IBF) and evaluate the factors associated with second-line efficacity. Methods: Ninety-four cases of advanced NSCLC patients with progressive disease (PD) post first-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy plus immunotherapy and administrated prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between November 2017 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were applied to determine predictive factors independently associated with second-line efficacity. Results: A total of 94 patients were incorporated in this study. Patients who continued the original ICIs after initial PD were defined as IBF (n=42), whereas those who discontinued immunotherapy were defined as non-IBF (n=52). The second-line objective response rates (ORR, ORR = CR + PR) of patients in the IBF and non-IBF groups were 13.5% vs. 28.6%, respectively (P=0.070). No significant survival difference was found between patients in the IBF and non-IBF groups in first-line median progression-free survival (PFS) (mPFS1, 6.2 vs. 5.1 months, P=0.490), second-line median PFS (mPFS2, 4.5 vs. 2.6 months, P=0.216), or median overall survival (OS) (mOS, 14.4 vs6 months (group A) than those of PFS1 ≤6 months (group B) (median PFS2, 4.6 vs. 3.2 months, P=0.038). Multivariate analyses did not reveal any independent prognostic factors for efficacy. Conclusions: The benefits of continuing prior ICIs administration beyond first-line immunotherapy progression might not be obvious in patients with advanced NSCLC, but those first line treatment showed a longer period may receive efficacy benefits.

【 授权许可】

Unknown