ESMO Open | |
A phase III randomized, controlled trial of nedaplatin versus cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer | |
article | |
X. Yang1  H. Ren2  Z. Li1  L. Zhang1  Y. Shao1  H. Li1  X. Yang1  Y. Sun1  X. Zhang1  Z. Wang1  J. Fu1  | |
[1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital;Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Pudong Medical Center | |
关键词: cervical cancer; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; nedaplatin; cisplatin; | |
DOI : 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100565 | |
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合) | |
来源: BMJ Publishing Group | |
【 摘 要 】
Background We evaluated the non-inferiority of nedaplatin-based and cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients.Design Patients aged 28-82 years with pathologically diagnosed cervical cancer (stage IB-IVA) were randomly chosen for the study. Patients in both the cisplatin and nedaplatin groups received radiotherapy and weekly intravenous nedaplatin 30 mg/m2 or cisplatin 40 mg/m2 concurrently.Results One hundred and sixty patients who received treatment between 10 May 2018 and 31 August 2020 were included. The 3-year overall survival in the nedaplatin group (median 30.5 months) was not significantly different from that in the cisplatin group (28.5 months; hazard ratio 0.131, 95% confidence interval 0.016-1.068; P = 0.058). No significant differences in hematological toxicity were observed between the two groups. Vomiting (40 versus 61), nausea (44 versus 67), and anorexia (52 versus 71) were more common in the cisplatin group whereas effects on liver function, including total bilirubin (7 versus 3), alanine aminotransferase (7 versus 2), and aspartate aminotransferase (6 versus 2), were more common in the nedaplatin group. Four patients in the cisplatin group had grade I creatinine elevation, whereas none in the nedaplatin group had abnormal creatinine levels. Two patients in the nedaplatin group discontinued concurrent chemotherapy because of infusion, and one patient in the cisplatin group discontinued treatment because of infusion-induced dizziness.Conclusions Our findings suggest that nedaplatin has a milder gastrointestinal reaction but a more significant effect on liver function than cisplatin. In patients with cervical cancer, nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy could serve as an alternative treatment to cisplatin.
【 授权许可】
CC BY|CC BY-NC-ND
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202306290002295ZK.pdf | 965KB | download |