The prognostic impact of tumor mutational burden (TMB) in the first-line management of advanced non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ESMO Open

article

A. Galvano¹  V. Gristina¹  U. Malapelle²  P. Pisapia²  F. Pepe²  N. Barraco¹  M. Castiglia¹  A. Perez¹  C. Rolfo³  G. Troncone²  A. Russo¹  V. Bazan⁴ 

[1] Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo;Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples;Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine;Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Palermo

关键词: NSCLC;    TMB;    ICIs;    prognostic;    meta-analysis;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100124

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: BMJ Publishing Group

【 摘 要 】

Background The role of tumor mutational burden (TMB) is still debated for selecting advanced non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who might benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Of note, TMB failed to predict a benefit in overall survival (OS) among such patients.Materials and methods The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare efficacy outcomes among first-line immune-oncology (IO) agents versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) within two subgroups (TMB-low and TMB-high on either tissue or blood). We collected hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate the association for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS, with the relative 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk ratios (RRs) were used as an association measure for objective response rate (ORR).Results Eight different cohorts of five randomized controlled phase III studies (3848 patients) were analyzed. In TMB-high patients, IO agents were associated with improved ORR (RRs 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.66), PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.79) and OS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.77) when compared with CT, thus suggesting a possible predictive role of high TMB for IO regimens. In TMB-low patients, the IO strategy did not lead to any significant benefit in survival and activity, whereas the pooled results of both ORR and PFS were intriguingly associated with a statistical significance in favor of CT.Conclusions This meta-analysis resulted in a proven benefit in OS in favor of IO agents in the TMB-high population. Although more prospective data are warranted, we postulated the hypothesis that monitoring TMB, in addition to the existing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level, could represent the preferable option for future clinical research in the first-line management of advanced non-oncogene addicted NSCLC patients.

【 授权许可】

CC BY|CC BY-NC-ND