User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment

BMJ Open Quality

article

Paul Bowie¹  Carl de Wet³  Tracey Crickett¹  Jan McCulloch⁵  Pauline Young⁵  John Freestone⁵  Paul Watson¹  Neil Houston⁶  Jill Gillies⁶  Duncan McNab¹ 

[1] Medical Directorate;Institute of Health and Wellbeing , University of Glasgow;Healthcare Improvement Unit , Queensland Health;School of Medicine , Griffith University;Primary Care;Healthcare Improvement Scotland

关键词: checklists;    audit and feedback;    general practice;    human factors;    safety management;   

DOI  :  10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000977

学科分类：药学

来源: BMJ Publishing Group

【 摘 要 】

Background Inadequate checking of safety-critical issues can compromise care quality in general practice (GP) work settings. Adopting a systemic, methodical approach may lead to improved standardisation of processes and reliability of task performance, strengthening the safety systems concerned. This study aimed to revise, modify and test the content and relevance of a previously validated safety checklist to the current GP context.Methods A multimethod study was undertaken in Scottish GP involving: consensus building workshops with users and ‘experts’ to revise checklist content; regional testing of the modified checklist and follow-up usability evaluation survey of users. Quantitative data underwent descriptive statistical analyses and selected survey free-text comments are presented.Results A redesigned checklist tool consisting of eight themes (eg, medication safety) and 61 items (eg, out-of-date stock is appropriately disposed) was agreed by 53 users/experts with items reclassified as: mandatory (n=25), essential (n=24) and advisory (n=12). Totally 42/55 GPs tested the tool and submitted checklist data (76.4%). The mean aggregated results demonstrated 92.0% compliance with all 61 checklist items (range: 83.0%–98.0%) and 25/42 GP managers responded to the survey (59.5%) and reported high mean levels of agreement on the usefulness of the checklist (77.0%), ease of use (89.0%), learnability (94.0%) and satisfaction (78.4%).Conclusions The checklist was comprehensively redesigned as a practical safety monitoring and improvement tool for potential implementation in Scottish GP. Testing and evaluation demonstrated high levels of checklist content compliance and strong usability feedback, but some variation was evident indicating room for improvement in current safety-critical checking processes. The checklist should be of interest in similar GP settings internationally and to other areas of primary care practice.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC|CC BY|CC BY-NC-ND