期刊论文详细信息
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Cross-analyzing addiction specialist and patient opinions and experiences about addictive disorder screening in primary care to identify interaction-related obstacles: a qualitative study
Research
Vincent Riffault1  Caroline Renard1  David Ciolfi1  Agathe Edeline1  Paul Brunault2  Jean Pierre Lebeau3  Hervé Breton3  Maxime Pautrat3 
[1] Department of General Practice, Tours Regional University Hospital, Tours, France;Department of General Practice, Tours Regional University Hospital, Tours, France;UMR 1253, iBrain, University of Tours, Inserm, Tours, France;Qualipsy EE 1901, University of Tours, Tours, France;Équipe de Liaison et de Soins en Addictologie, CHRU de Tours, Service d’Addictologie Universitaire, Tours, France;Faculty of Medicine, University of Tours, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France;Department of General Practice, Tours Regional University Hospital, Tours, France;
关键词: Addictive disorders;    Addiction specialist;    Substance use disorder;    Mass screening;    Primary health care;    Early detection;    Self-disclosure;    Patient-centered approach;    Interprofessional collaboration;    Psychological barriers;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s13011-023-00522-5
 received in 2022-11-15, accepted in 2023-02-04,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPromptly identifying individuals with addictive disorders reduces mortality and morbidity and improves quality of life. Although screening in primary care with the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral Treatment strategy has been recommended since 2008, it remains underutilized. This may be due to barriers including lack of time, patient reluctance or perhaps the timing and approach for discussing addiction with their patients.ObjectiveThis study aims to explore and cross-analyze patient and addiction specialist experiences and opinions about early addictive disorder screening in primary care to identify interaction-related screening obstacles.Design and participantsQualitative study with purposive maximum variation sampling among nine addiction specialists and eight individuals with addiction disorders conducted between April 2017 and November 2019 in Val-de-Loire, France.Main MeasuresUsing a grounded theory approach, verbatim data was collected from face-to-face interviews with addiction specialists and individuals with addiction disorders. These interviews explored their opinions and experiences with addiction screening in primary care. Initially, two independent investigators analyzed the coded verbatim according to the data triangulation principle. Secondly, convergences and divergences between addiction specialist and addict verbatim categories were identified, analyzed, and conceptualized.Key ResultsFour main interaction-related obstacles to early addictive disorder screening in primary care were identified and conceptualized: the new concepts of shared self-censorship and the patient's personal red line, issues not addressed during consultations, and opposition between how physicians and patients would like to approach addictive disorder screening.ConclusionsTo continue analysis of addictive disorder screening dynamics, further studies to examine the perspectives of all those involved in primary care are required. The information revealed from these studies will provide ideas to help patients and caregivers start discussing addiction and to help implement a collaborative team-based care approach.Trial registrationThis study is registered with the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) under No. 2017–093.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305159381491ZK.pdf 1239KB PDF download
Fig. 1 404KB Image download
MediaObjects/13011_2023_522_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 144KB PDF download
MediaObjects/13011_2023_522_MOESM2_ESM.pdf 141KB PDF download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_4577_MOESM1_ESM.docx 46KB Other download
MediaObjects/13011_2023_522_MOESM4_ESM.pdf 147KB PDF download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:29次 浏览次数:0次