Comparison of single-pore non-liposuction near-infrared laparoscopy with conventional open surgery for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early breast cancer: a single-center, small-sample retrospective study

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Research

Changchun Liu¹  Jiayi Xian¹  Cheng-cai Yao² 

[1]Department of Breast Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, and Sixth Clinical College of South China University of Technology, 528225, Foshan, People’s Republic of China

[2]Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, and Sixth Clinical College of South China University of Technology, 528225, Foshan, People’s Republic of China

关键词: Early breast cancer;    Indocyanide green;    Carbon nanoparticle suspension;    Sentinel lymph node biopsy;    Near-infrared endoscopy;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12957-023-02942-w

 received in 2022-11-23, accepted in 2023-02-11,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the effects of single-pore non-liposuction near-infrared (NIR) endoscopic surgery and traditional open surgery for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC).MethodsThe clinical pathological data of 61 patients with EBC who underwent axillary SLNB using indocyanine green (ICG) combined with carbon nanoparticle suspension (CNS) were retrospectively collected. Thirty patients received SLNB through single-pore non-liposuction NIR endoscopic surgery (endoscopic group), and the remaining 31 received SLNB through open-incision surgery (open group). The success rate, operation time, volume of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative axillary drainage, axillary extubation time, and the occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between the groups along with the total number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), luminous SLNs, stained SLNs, and the pathological positivity rate of the SLNs.ResultsAll patients underwent SLNB with a 100% success rate. SLNB operation times of the endoscopic group were longer than those of the open group (t = 3.963, P = 0.000), and the volume of axillary drainage was inferior (t = 3.035, P = 0.004). However, there were no differences in the intraoperative bleeding volumes, axillary extubation times, and postoperative complications (P > 0.05). In the Open group, the mean number of SLNs was 5.12 ± 2.16, and the pathological positivity rate was 13.53%; in the Endoscopic group, these numbers were 4.89 ± 1.73 and 12.39%. The mean number of SLNs detected (t = 0.458, P = 0.649) and the pathological positivity rates (χ2 = 0.058, P = 0.810) did not differ between the two groups. All 61 patients were followed for a median of 14.6 months. There were no local recurrences or distant metastases.ConclusionsOur single-center results reveal that single-hole non-liposuction NIR endoscopic axillary SLNB is not inferior to open SLNB and may be an appropriate option for patients with early breast cancer who desire breast preservation with fewer incisions.Trial registrationThis retrospective study was “retrospectively registered” at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology (no. 2020105) and in National Medical Research Registration and Archival Information System (https://www.medicalresearch.org.cn, number: MR-44-21-004727).

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

Fig. 4

Fig. 1