期刊论文详细信息
Cancer Imaging
Semiautomated pelvic lymph node treatment response evaluation for patients with advanced prostate cancer: based on MET-RADS-P guidelines
Research Article
Jialun Li1  Yaofeng Zhang1  Xiangpeng Wang1  Zemin Zhu2  Xiaoying Wang3  Xiang Liu3  Xiaodong Zhang3  Kexin Wang4 
[1]Beijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd, 100011, Beijing, China
[2]Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, 412000, Zhuzhou, China
[3]Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8 Xishiku Street, 100034, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
[4]School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, 100069, Beijing, China
关键词: Deep learning;    MET-RADS-P criteria;    Pelvic lymph nodes;    Metastases;    DWI;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40644-023-00523-4
 received in 2022-10-04, accepted in 2023-01-05,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundThe evaluation of treatment response according to METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P) criteria is an important but time-consuming task for patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC). A deep learning-based algorithm has the potential to assist with this assessment.ObjectiveTo develop and evaluate a deep learning-based algorithm for semiautomated treatment response assessment of pelvic lymph nodes.MethodsA total of 162 patients who had undergone at least two scans for follow-up assessment after APC metastasis treatment were enrolled. A previously reported deep learning model was used to perform automated segmentation of pelvic lymph nodes. The performance of the deep learning algorithm was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volumetric similarity (VS). The consistency of the short diameter measurement with the radiologist was evaluated using Bland–Altman plotting. Based on the segmentation of lymph nodes, the treatment response was assessed automatically with a rule-based program according to the MET-RADS-P criteria. Kappa statistics were used to assess the accuracy and consistency of the treatment response assessment by the deep learning model and two radiologists [attending radiologist (R1) and fellow radiologist (R2)].ResultsThe mean DSC and VS of the pelvic lymph node segmentation were 0.82 ± 0.09 and 0.88 ± 0.12, respectively. Bland–Altman plotting showed that most of the lymph node measurements were within the upper and lower limits of agreement (LOA). The accuracies of automated segmentation-based assessment were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95) and 75% (95% CI: 0.46–0.92) for target lesions, nontarget lesions and nonpathological lesions, respectively. The consistency of treatment response assessment based on automated segmentation and manual segmentation was excellent for target lesions [K value: 0.92 (0.86–0.98)], good for nontarget lesions [0.82 (0.74–0.90)] and moderate for nonpathological lesions [0.71 (0.50–0.92)].ConclusionThe deep learning-based semiautomated algorithm showed high accuracy for the treatment response assessment of pelvic lymph nodes and demonstrated comparable performance with radiologists.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305118022013ZK.pdf 1948KB PDF download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq473.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq476.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 3 60KB Image download
Fig. 21 75KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq487.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq487.gif

Fig. 21

Fig. 3

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq476.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq473.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:2次